Skip to content

A comparison of sedatives used during gastroscopy, alfentanil vs midazolam

A comparison of sedatives used during gastroscopy, alfentanil vs midazolam

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2018-000026-54-SE
Enrollment
150
Registered
2018-07-23
Start date
2018-09-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sedative effect during gastroscopy

Interventions

Trade Name: Alfentanil Hameln Pharmaceutical Form: Injection Trade Name: Midazolam Panpharma Product Name: Midazolam Panpharma Product Code: 15745 Pharmaceutical Form: Injection

Sponsors

Medicinkliniken, Sjukhuset Lidköping
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient between 18-80 years old Refererred for policlinical routine gastroscopy In need of sedative agent Patient can communicate Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 100 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 50

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Allergies to any of the used agents Unable to communicate Any planned therapuetical interventions Patient has a suspected alcohol, narcotic och abuse of other drugs, or previous abuse Pregnant patient Severe lung disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To investigate if midazolam and alfenatnil have same sedative effect and if rapifed;Secondary Objective: If rapifes has less post procedural side effect;Primary end point(s): If the patient can leave the practice earlier if given Alfentanil If the sedative effect is non-inferior to midazolam;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Evaluation when patient leaves the practice

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Number of examinations cancelled or aborted due to ineffective sedation. Patients experience of the examination. The doctors experience of the sedatives potency. comparison of side eccets. If the patient can see themselves undergo a new examination in the furutre.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: During the examination and when the patient leaves the practice

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

Public ContactMedicinkliniken, Skas L

Skaraborgs Sjukhus

+4615085000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026