Skip to content

Randomised Placebo-controlled Double Blind Clinical Trial in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: The RECEDE Myelopathy Trial

Regeneration in Cervical Degenerative Myelopathy - a multi-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial assessing the efficacy of Ibudilast as an adjuvant treatment to decompressive surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy - RECEDE Myelopathy

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2017-004856-41-GB
Enrollment
362
Registered
2020-01-23
Start date
2020-03-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Interventions

Product Name: Ibudilast Product Code: N/A Pharmaceutical Form: Capsule INN or Proposed INN: Ibudilast 10 mg: The Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP) CAS Number: 50847-11-5 Current Sponsor code: Ibudilast Othe
Medicinova MN-166
Vichang
KC-404
Pinatos Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration type: range Concentration number: 60-100 Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Capsule Route of administration of the placebo: Oral use

Sponsors

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Cambridge
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Male or female, ages 18 to 80 years who have granted informed consent to participate • Patients suffering from Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy • Have a preoperative mJOA score =8 and =14 • Scheduled for first surgical decompression as part of usual clinical practice Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: 0 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 217 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 145

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Previous surgery for DCM • DCM symptoms due to cervical trauma (at the discretion of the investigator) • Hypersensitivity to Ibudilast or any of the formulation components • Evidence of acute hepatitis, clinically significant chronic hepatitis, or evidence of clinically significant impaired hepatic function through clinical and laboratory evaluation including ALP> 1.5x ULN; ALT or AST > 2x ULN; GGT > 3x ULN • Evidence of thrombocytopenia at screening through laboratory evaluation including platelet count 450 ms • History of stomach or intestinal surgery or any other condition that could interfere with or is judged by the investigator to interfere with absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of IMP • Unable to converse, read or write English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The aim of this trial is to estimate the difference in the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) neck pain at 6 months after surgery between Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) patients randomised to Ibudilast and those randomised to placebo. The mJOA is a fully validated outcome assessment for function in DCM. The VAS is the most popular tool for the measurement of pain in DCM. The hypothesis is that Ibudilast improves neurological recovery following surgical decompression of DCM.;Secondary Objective: 1) To compare the clinical efficacy of Ibudilast treatment at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery, using a representative range of DCM outcome assessments The exploratory objectives include: 1) To undertake a health economic evaluation of Ibudilast therapy 2) To assess the bioavailability of Ibudilast in the CSF and blood. 3) To assess the informal care burden of DCM 4) To assess the potential of novel quantitative clinical assessments (Gait Laboratory) ;Primary end point(s): The primary outcome measures are the change in the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (mJOA) and the change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) neck pain between screening and 6 months post-operatively. The mJOA is an 18-point clinician administered scale (0 worst to 18 best), which evaluates motor dysfunction in upper and lower extremities, loss of sensation, and sphincter dysfunction. The VAS Neck pain is a 10cm horizontal line, on which a patient indicates their level of neck pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: The primary outcome will be evaluated as the difference in these parameters between baseline (screening visit) and 6-months post-operatively (±21 days). These two parameters are also evaluated for exploratory purposes in the pre-operative, 3 months and 12 months follow-up visits. VAS neck pain is also evaluated for exploratory purposes at post-operative vi

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): 1. Physical Summary Score (PSC) of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire: a well-recognised measure of patient physical health 2. Mental Summary Score (MSC) of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire: a well-recognised measure of patient mental health;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: SF36 is evaluated at screening, pre-operative and then 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactCarrie Bayliss

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Cambridge

carrie.bayliss@addenbrookes.nhs.uk01223348158

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026