Skip to content

Venetoclax after chemotherapy R-BAC in high-risk elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma

Rituximab, bendamustine and cytarabine followed by venetoclax (V-RBAC) in high-risk elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2017-004628-31-IT
Enrollment
130
Registered
2018-03-19
Start date
2018-05-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mantle Cell Lymphoma in elderly patients MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10026799 Term: Mantle cell lymphoma NOS System Organ Class: 100000004864

Interventions

Trade Name: Venclyxto Product Name: Venclyxto Pharmaceutical Form: Film-coated tablet

Sponsors

Fondazione Italiana Linfomi ONLUS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Previously untreated patients with MCL aged =65 years if they are FIT according to the geriatric CGA assessment. 2. age =64 years not eliglible to high-dose chemotherapy plus transplantation, FIT or UNFIT according to the geriatric CGA assessment. 3. Measurable nodal or extranodal disease = 1.5 cm in longest diameter, and measurable in 2 perpendicular dimensions. 4. ECOG performance status =2. 5. Positivity for cyclin D1 and/or SOX11 [the latter being mandatory in cases lacking cyclin D1- or t(11;14)-negative]. 6. Adequate renal function (Creatinine clearance >50 mL/min), with preserved diuresis. 7. Adequate liver function: alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) =65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 100

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive. 2. Previous treatment for lymphoma. 3. Disease confined to the bone marrow/peripheral blood/spleen, without any other nodal or extranodal involvement. 4. In-situ MCL. 5. Medical conditions or organ injuries that could interfere with administration of therapy. 6. Active bacterial, viral, or fungal infection requiring systemic therapy. 7. Seizure disorders requiring anticonvulsant therapy. 8. Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with hypoxiemia. 9. History of severe cardiac disease: New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III-IV, myocardial infarction within 6 months, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, dilatative cardiomyopathy, or unstable angina. 10. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. 11. Active secondary malignancy. 12. Known hypersensitivity or anaphylactic reactions to murine antibodies and proteins, to Bendamustine or mannitol. 13. Major surgery within 4 weeks of study Day 1. 14. HBsAg+ 15. HCVAb+ patients with active viral replication (HCV-RNA+ with AST>2 x normal limit) 16. Any co-existing medical or psychological condition that would preclude participation in the study or compromise the patient’s ability to give informed consent, or that may affect the interpretation of the results, or render the patient at high risk from treatment complications. 17. CNS involvement 18. Chronic treatment with strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitors (e.g. ketoconazole, ritonavir, clarithromycin, itraconazole, voriconazole)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To evaluate whether the addition of venetoclax after R-BAC to HR patients with MCL, as defined above, improves the results of the standard R-BAC, in terms of PFS.;Secondary Objective: Not applicable;Primary end point(s): 2-years progression-free survival (PFS) of the HR patients from date of enrollment;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 24 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): • The proportion of molecular response (analyzed in the labs of the FIL-MRD Network) • The progression-free survival (PFS) of all enrolled patients, and of different subgroups (i.e TP53 mutated patients) • The overall survival (OS) • The duration of responses (DoR) • The proportion of complete remission (CR) before and after venetoclax in the HR group and/or in the LR not responding to R-BAC. • The proportion of patients that complete the expected treatment schedule • The safety of venetoclax when administered as consolidation or maintenance after R-BAC ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: • 10 and 30 months • 24 months • 54 months • 24 months • 6 and 10 months • 30 months • 10 and 30 months

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Public ContactUffici studi FIL

Fondazione Italiana Linfomi ONLUS

aferranti@filinf.it00390131206129

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026