Skip to content

Efficacy of bone marrow-derived stem cells in treatment of knee cartilage defects.

Efficacy of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells seeded on a 3D scaffold in treatment of knee cartilage defects. A randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-centre clinical trial. - Efficacy of BM-MSC seeded on a 3D scaffold in knee cartilage defects.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2017-004143-21-CZ
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-08-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Cartilage Defect MedDRA version: 27.0 Level: PT Classification code 10007710 Term: Cartilage injury System Organ Class: 10022117 - Injury, poisoning and procedural complications MedDRA version: 21.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10007705 Term: Cartilage damage System Organ Class: 10022117 - Injury, poisoning and procedural complications MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10057104 Term: Cartilage repair System Organ Class: 10042613 - Surgical and medical procedures MedD

Interventions

Product Name: Human autologous mesenchymal stem cells Product Code: BiCure ortho MSCp Pharmaceutical Form: Suspension for injection in pre-filled syringe INN or Proposed INN: Human autologous mesenc

Sponsors

Bioinova, a.s.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult patients of either sex, age between 18 and 55 years. 2. Confirmed diagnosis of chondral defects of the weight bearing compartment of the knee joint up to the radiologically confirmed knee osteoarthrosis stage II (according to Kellgren classification), the cause of the defect being either trauma or incipient degeneration. 3. Defect is located in the weigh-bearing part of femoral condyle. 4. Scheduled to undergo an open surgery of the knee for the chondral defect management (namely microfracture of the subchondral bone followed by the application of a 3D scaffold). 5. Isolated chondral defect with a maximum size of 6 cm2. 6. No previous knee surgery due to a treatment of a chondral defect. 7. Preoperative level of hemoglobin at least 110 g per L. 8. Preoperative level of platelet count higher than 150 000 per mL. 9. Sexually active, nonsterile female patients need to use highly effective contraception during the whole study. 10. Able to provide written informed consent. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 40 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Axial deformities over 10° on the study knee. 2. Systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive medication, or anticoagulant therapy, ongoing or recent, (used regularly during the last 3 months before the planned knee surgery). Intraarticular corticosteroid medication is not allowed within the same time period. 3. Active infection or any other condition limiting the healing (e.g., immunodeficiency, hepatitis, active tuberculosis, neoplasm, diabetes and other serious metabolic disorders, drug abuse, etc.). 4. Concurrent or previous cancer. 5. Blood, plasma or platelet transfusion during previous 8 weeks. 6. Pregnant or lactating women. 7. BMI higher than 40. 8. Clinical instability of the knee joint.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Efficacy: To compare the treatment efficacy of a combination of conventional microfracture and autologous MSC seeded onto the acellular 3D scaffold as compared to the commonly used method of microfracture and application of the scaffold alone, in subjects with knee joint chondral lesion.;Secondary Objective: Safety: To confirm the safety of autologous MCS administration, as has previously been demonstrated in other orthopaedic indications (rotator cuff, revision hip arthroplasty, posterolateral spinal fusion etc.).;Primary end point(s): 1) Lysholm score (comparison of score changes between the study arms). 2) KOOS value (comparison of score changes between the study arms). 3) Pain according to VAS (comparison of score changes between the study arms). 4) X-ray and MRI evaluation ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 24 months after treatment administration

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): 1) Lysholm-Tegner knee function score 2) KOOS value 3) Pain according to VAS 4) X-ray and MRI evaluation. 5) Adverse event profiles ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 1) Lysholm score, at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment administration 2) KOOS value, at 3 , 6 and 12 months after treatment administration 3) Pain according to VAS, at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment administration 4) Adverse event profiles at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment administration 5) X-ray and MRI evaluation at 12 months after treatment administration.

Countries

Czech Republic

Contacts

Public ContactHeadquarters

Bioinova, a.s.

peter.bauer@bioinova.cz+420739385222

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026