Skip to content

HYVET-2: Treatment of white coat HYypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET 2) - Feasibility of a randomised controlled trial

A Multi-Centred, Open Label, Randomised Study Assessing the Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Treatment of White Coat Hypertension with Established Anti-Hypertensive Drugs versus Standard of Care in the Very Elderly - Feasibility Study - HYVET 2: Treatment of white coat HYpertension in the Very Elderly

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2017-004004-22-GB
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-01-18
Start date
2018-03-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

White Coat Hypertension

Interventions

Trade Name: ALKAPAMID XL 1.5mg prolonged release tablets Product Name: ALKAPAMID XL 1.5mg prolonged release tablets Pharmaceutical Form: Tablet INN or Proposed INN: Indapamide Concentration unit: mg m

Sponsors

University of Sussex
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Patients =75 years of age • Clinic sitting systolic BP =150mmHg but =65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 100

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Contraindication to the use of indapamide MR and perindopril in accordance with the summary of product characteristics • Regular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. Regular use being defined by the local GP with consideration to cardiovascular risk and blood pressure • Hypertensive emergency • Secondary hypertension • Postural hypotension (postural drop in systolic BP=20mmHg or postural symptoms at screening) • Any stroke or myocardial infarction in the previous 6 months • Heart failure requiring treatment with drugs having an antihypertensive effect • Previous documented evidence of gout • eGFR less than 30ml/min • Montreal cognitive assessment score (MoCA) < 22 • Life expectancy <1year due to malignancy or chronic disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: This is a feasibility study, which serves as a prelude to a definitive randomised controlled trial to determine whether the treatment of WCH in the very elderly outweighs any adverse events. The primary research question is: Will it be feasible to conduct a study treating WCH in a cohort of older people? To answer the above question, this feasibility study will focus on the following outcomes: 1. The proportion of eligible patients that can be recruited from initial screening 2. An exploration of different methods of identifying/recruiting patients including preliminary experience using the National Institute for Health Research/Clinical Research Network recruitment methods 3. The willingness of GPs to recruit and randomise patients 4. The willingness of patients to be randomised 5. Recruitment rate 6. Adherence to the treatment protocol 7. Withdrawal from the clinical trial 8. Expanding the opportunities for PPI (patient and public involvement) in the research design and its subseque;Secondary Objective: As this is a feasibility trial there are no secondary objectives;Primary end point(s): This is a feasibility study, which serves as a prelude to a definitive randomised controlled trial, in order to determine whether the treatment of WCH in the very elderly is feasible and outweighs any adverse events. This feasibility study will focus on the following outcomes: 1. The proportion of eligible patients that can be recruited from initial screening 2. An exploration of different methods of identifying/recruiting patients including preliminary experience using the National Institute for Health Research/Clinical Research Network recruitment methods 3. The willingness of GPs to recruit and randomise patients 4. The willingness of patients to be randomised 5. Recruitment rate 6. Adherence to the treatment protocol 7. Withdrawal from the clinical trial 8. Expanding the opportunities for PPI (patient and public involvement) in the research design and its su

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): As this is a feasibility study there are no secondary end points;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Not applicable.

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactNicky Perry

Brighton and Sussex Clinical Trials Unit

n.perry@bsms.ac.uk01273641469

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026