Skip to content

Rituximab maintenance will be compared to “lenalidomide plus rituximab maintenance followed by lenalidomide only maintenance” for relapsed/refractory Follicular, Marginal Zone or Mantle Cell Lymphoma

A Phase 3b randomized study of lenalidomide (CC-5013) plus rituximab maintenance therapy followed by lenalidomide single-agent maintenance versus rituximab maintenance in subjects with relapsed/refractory follicular, marginal zone or mantle cell lymphoma.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2017-002290-19-DE
Enrollment
450
Registered
2017-07-25
Start date
2017-12-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

relapsed/refractory follicular, marginal zone or mantle cell lymphoma

Interventions

Sponsors

Celgene Corporation
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age =18 years Histologically confirmed Follicular Lymphoma (Grade 1, 2 or 3a), Marginal Zone Lymphoma, or Mantle Cell Lymphoma Must have documented relapsed, refractory or Progressive Disease after last treatment with systemic therapy Bi-dimensionally measurable disease Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status = 2 Adequate bone marrow function Willingness to follow pregnancy precautions Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 220 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 280

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Histology other than follicular or marginal zone lymphoma or clinical evidence of transformation or Grade 3b follicular lymphoma Any medical condition (other than the underlying lymphoma) that requires chronic steroid use Subjects taking corticosteroids during the last 1 week prior treatment, unless administered at a dose equivalent to < 20 mg/day of prednisone Systemic anti-lymphoma therapy within 28 days or use of antibody agents within 8 weeks use of radioimmunotherapy within 3 months Known seropositive for or active viral infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Known sensitivity or allergy to murine products Presence or history of central nervous system involvement by lymphoma. Subjects who are at a risk for a thromboembolic event and are not willing to take prophylaxis for it. Any condition that places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or that confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus rituximab combination maintenance therapy (for 18 cycles) followed by optional lenalidomide single-agent maintenance (to progression) versus rituximab single-agent maintenance (for 18 cycles) after 12 cycles of induction therapy with lenalidomide plus rituximab, in subjects with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma grades 1-3b, transformed follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma.;Secondary Objective: The secondary objectives of the study are: 1. To compare the safety of lenalidomide plus rituximab combination maintenance therapy (for 18 cycles) followed by optional lenalidomide single-agent maintenance (to progression) versus rituximab single-agent maintenance (for 18 cycles) after 12 cycles of induction therapy with lenalidomide plus rituximab. 2. To compare other parameters of efficacy (OS, IOR, ORR, CRR, DOR, DOCR, TTNLT, TTHT) of lenalidomide plus rituximab combination maintenance therapy (for 18 cycles) followed by optional lenalidomide single-agent maintenance (to progression) versus rituximab single-agent maintenance (for 18 cycles) after 12 cycles of induction therapy with lenalidomide plus rituximab.;Primary end point(s): Progression free survival (PFS) for Follicular lymphoma (FL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL);Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: At 3 cycles (84 days +/- 2 weeks) At 6 cycles (168 days +/- 2 weeks) Every 6 cycles (168 days +/- 2 weeks) up to five years Thereafter annually (+/- 3 weeks) up to Progession Disease, or initiation of new anti-lymphome therapy

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Secondary efficacy endpoints will include: Overall Survival (OS) Improvement of Response (IOR) Overall Response Rate (ORR) Complete Response Rate (CRR) Duration of Response (DOR) Duration of Complete Response (DOCR) Time to Histological Transformation (TTHT) Time to Next Anti-Lymphoma Treatment (TTNLT) Safety;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: At 3 cycles (84 days +/- 2 weeks) At 6 cycles (168 days +/- 2 weeks) Every 6 cycles (168 days +/- 2 weeks) up to five years Thereafter annually (+/- 3 weeks) up to Progession Disease, or initiation of new anti-lymphome therapy

Countries

Germany, United States

Contacts

Public ContactGSM-CT

Celgene Corporation

clinical.trials@bms.com+34900834223

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026