Skip to content

Multinational Clinical Study Comparing Isatuximab,Carfilzomib And Dexamethasone To Carfilzomib And Dexamethasone In Relapse And/Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients

Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study Assessing The Clinical Benefit Of Isatuximab Combined With Carfilzomib (Kyprolis®) And Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib With Dexamethasone In Patients With Relapse And/Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With 1 to 3 Prior Lines

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2017-001940-37-CZ
Enrollment
300
Registered
2017-07-27
Start date
2017-09-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plasma cell myeloma MedDRA version: 21.1 Level: PT Classification code 10035226 Term: Plasma cell myeloma System Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)

Interventions

Sponsors

Sanofi-aventis recherche & développement
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Patients with multiple myeloma previously treated with prior 1 to 3 lines and with measurable serum M-protein (= 0.5 g/dL) and/or urine M-protein (= 200 mg/24 hours). Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 100 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 200

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Patients previously pretreated with carfilzomib, who never achieved at least one minor response during previous therapies and/or last previous therapy completed within 14 last days. -Patients with only free light measurable. -Patients less than 18 years old, patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status more than 2. -Patients with inadequate biological tests. -Patients with myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina pectoris, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure, superior or equal to grade 3 arrhythmias, stroke or transient ischemic attack within last 6 months, and/or left ventricular ejection fraction lower than 40%. -Patients with previous cancer unless disease free for more than 5 years or in situ cancer curatively treated. -Patients with known acquired immunodeficiency syndrome related illness or requiring antiretroviral treatment, or hepatitis A, B, or C active infection. -Women of childbearing potential or male patient with women of childbearing potential who do not agree to use highly effective method of birth control.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To demonstrate the benefit of isatuximab in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone in the prolongation of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as compared to carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with 1 to 3 lines of therapy.;Secondary Objective: -Evaluate the Overall Response Rate, rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better and complete response rate in both arms using IMWG criteria. -Evaluate rate of VGPR or better with minimal residual disease negativity in both arms using IMWG criteria. -Evaluate the Overall Survival in both arms -Evaluate safety in both arms -Evaluate duration of response in both arms. -Evaluate the Time To Progression in both arms. -Evaluate time from the date of randomization to the date of the second PD or death from any cause, whichever happen first (PFS2) in both arms. -Evaluate time to first response in both arms -Evaluate time to best response in both arms -Determine the PK profile of isatuximab in combination with carfilzomib. -Evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab in isatuximab arm. -Assess disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life, disease and treatment-related symptoms, health state utility, and health status in both arms.;Primary end point(s): Progression Free Suvival (PFS): The length of time between treatment allocation and a patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: up to approximately 60 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): 1) Overall Response Rate (ORR): The proportion of patients that have a response to their disease: stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) 2) Rate of VGPR or better: The proportion of patients with sCR, CR and VGPR 3) CR rate: The proportion of patients with sCR and CR 4) Rate of CR with MRD(Minimal Residual Disease) negativity: The proportion of patients =CR (sCR and CR) and for whom MRD assessed by sequencing is negative. 5) Overall Survival (OS): The length of time from the treatment allocation for a disease that patients are still alive 6) Time to Progression (TTP): How long the study treatment last before disease progression occurs 7) Second Progression Free Survial (PFS2): The length of time between treatment allocation and second progression disease 8) Duration of response (DOR): How long from the first response is observed until disease progression 9) Number of patients with adverse events according to the National Cancer Institute - Common Toxicity Criteria(NCI- CTC) version 4.03 grading scaling: To evaluate how many adverse events occur while taking study treatment 10) Patient-reported outcome measured with Quality of Life questionnaire : To evaluate change in your daily activites from screening 11) Pharmacokinetics of isatuximab: To evaluate the plasma concentration of isatuximab 12) Pharmacokinetics of carfilzomib: To evaluate the plasma concentration of carfilzomib in 12 patients 13) Immunogenicity (ADA): To evaluate if presence of anti-drug antibodies against isatuximab 14) Time to first response: Length of time from treatment allocation to the date of first response (PR or better) 15) Time to best response: Length of time from treatment allocation to the date of first best overall response (PR or better);Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 1), 2), 3), 4), 6), 7), 8) 14) 15) up to approximately 50 months 5) up to approximately 63 mont

Countries

Australia, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Czech Republic, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Korea, Republic of, New Zealand, Russian Federation, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

Public Contactwww.sanofi.cz

sanofi-aventis, s.r.o.

cz-info@sanofi.com+420233 086 111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026