Skip to content

Prostaglandin insert (Propess) versus trans-cervical balloon catheter for out-patient labour induction: A randomised controlled trial of feasibility (PROBIT-F)

Prostaglandin insert (Propess) versus tran-scervical balloon catheter for out-patient labour induction: A randomised controlled trial of feasibility (PROBIT-F) - Trans-cervical balloon catheter and prostaglandin for labour induction

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2017-001914-27-GB
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-05-10
Start date
2017-08-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Induction of Labour

Interventions

Trade Name: propess Product Name: propess Pharmaceutical Form: Vaginal delivery system INN or Proposed INN: DINOPROSTONE Other descriptive name: PROSTIN E2 Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentr

Sponsors

St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Pregnant women aged 18 years or over with a single fetus and uncomplicated pregnancy, who were at a Gestational age > 37 completed weeks, needing induction of labour. 2. No medical risk factors. 3. Able to provide informed consent Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: 0 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 120 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 0

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Unsuitable for outpatient management 2. Unsuitable for randomisation to either PGE2 (e.g. previous Caesarean section/hypersensitivity to Prostaglandins) or catheter use (e.g. latex allergy), or prior attempted IOL in this pregnancy. 3. Had ruptured membranes, or evidence of regular uterine contractions at time of booked induction. 4. Multiple pregnancy or non-vertex presentation; 5. Placenta praevia. 6. Lethal fetal congenital anomaly. 7. Non-vertex presentation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: This is a feasibility study. The primary objective is to determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of Prostaglandin pessary versus trans-cervical balloon catheter for out-patient induction of labour. ;Secondary Objective: The secondary aim is to assess women’s experience with these methods and their preference and to assess the clinical efficacy, cost effectiveness and safety of trans-cervical balloon catheter compared to Prostaglandins for out-patient induction of labour in low-risk women. Logistic issues of Propess and balloon catheter induction, and possible problems with them would come to light only after a feasibility trial has been conducted. Data will also be gathered on clinical outcomes including mode of birth, rate of labour and birth complications, admissions to NNU, maternal and infant morbidity and on women's experiences of induction using the different methods.;Primary end point(s): Number of eligible women willing to be randomised to Propess or balloon catheter in an outpatient setting.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: End of 12 month Recruitment period

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026