Compare epidural and conventional pain treatment after laparoskopic colorectal surgery.
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Laparoskopic colorectal surgery, informed consent given. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 90 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 70
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Severe renal, hepatic insufficiency, severe COPD, cancer T4, hematological disease, preoperative use of opioids, coagulation disturbances or any impossibility to put epidural catheter, over 50% risk of surgery conversion.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Main Objective: Primary outcome is the opioid consumption 48h postoperatively.;Secondary Objective: Secondary outcomes: pain intensity, initiation of the bowel action, intraoperative fluid balance, postoperative complications, ward-stay time. Additionally, we will compare the efficacy of pain treatments in two subgroups: left- and right hemicolonectomy.;Primary end point(s): Primary outcome is the opioid consumption 48h postoperatively.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 48h and 3 month after surgery. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary end point(s): Secondary outcomes: pain intensity, initiation of the bowel action, intraoperative fluid balance, postoperative complications, ward-stay time. Additionally, we will compare the efficacy of pain treatments in two subgroups: left- and right hemicolonectomy.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 3 month | — |
Countries
Finland
Contacts
Helsinki University hospital