Skip to content

A clinical trial to compare Insulin Lispro and Insulin Aspart for use in pumps in patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

An Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Trial of CSII Reservoir In-use Comparing Insulin Lispro Formulation to Insulin Aspart in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2017-001162-21-Outside-EU/EEA
Enrollment
132
Registered
2017-04-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1

Interventions

Trade Name: Humalog Product Name: Humalog Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection INN or Proposed INN: INSULIN LISPRO CAS Number: 133107-64-9 Concentration unit: IU/ml international unit(s)/millil

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: To be included in the study, patients had to be 13 years or older, diagnosed with T1DM (World Health Organization criteria) for at least 24 months with HbA1c between 5% and 9% and body mass index (BMI) ?35.0 kg/m2 at baseline. Patients had to be using CSII therapy for at least the 6 months prior to Visit 1 with mean total daily insulin dose for 3 days prior to Visit 1 of ?46 units (U)/day using a 300-U reservoir, ?30 U/day using a 200-U reservoir, or ?26 U/day using 180-U reservoir. Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: 15 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 105 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 12

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients were excluded from participation in the study if they have had impaired renal function; legal blindness; an episode of hypoglycemia coma, seizures or disorientation, hypoglycemic unawareness; emergency room visits or hospitalizations due to poor glucose control; pump-related infusion site abscess in the 12 months prior to Visit 1; or a history of a staphylococcus aureus infection in the past 5 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: 1) Day 6 of 6 days of pump reservoir in-use of Humalog 6D was noninferior to Day 6 of 6 days of pump reservoir in-use of Aspart 6D with regards to 7-point daily mean self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG; margin = 0.6 mmol/L). 2) Day 6 of 6 days of pump reservoir in-use of Humalog 6D was noninferior to Day 2 of 2 days of pump reservoir in-use of Humalog 2D with regards to 7-point daily mean SMBG (margin = 0.6 mmol/L). 3)Day 6 of 6 days of pump reservoir in-use of Humalog 6D was superior to Day 6 of 6 days of pump reservoir in-use of Aspart 6D with regards to 7-point daily mean SMBG.;Secondary Objective: - compare Humalog 6D to Aspart 6D at various time points with respect to mean SMBG, insulin dose, hypoglycemic events, pump complications, hyperglycemic events, adverse events (AEs), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c); ;Primary end point(s): HbA1C ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Day 6

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): HbA1C;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Day 6

Countries

United States

Contacts

Public ContactClinical Trial Registry Office

Eli Lilly

EU_Lilly_Clinical_Trails@lilly.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026