Skip to content

Effectiveness of vasodilators and topic anaesthesia in prevention of radial spasm.

Effectiveness in preventing RAdial Spasm of different vasoDIlators and topic Local Anaesthesia during transradial cardiac catheterization: The E-RADIAL trial. - E-RADIAL

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2017-000321-12-ES
Enrollment
668
Registered
2017-04-07
Start date
2018-02-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Radial spasm during cardiac catheterization MedDRA version: 19.1 Level: PT Classification code 10003175 Term: Arterial spasm System Organ Class: 10047065 - Vascular disorders

Interventions

Trade Name: EMLA 25mg/g + 25mg/g crema Pharmaceutical Form: Cream INN or Proposed INN: LIDOCAINE Current Sponsor code: 61.096 Concentration unit: mg/g milligram(s)/gram Concentration type: equal Conce

Sponsors

ÁREA DE ATENCIÓN INTEGRADA DE ALBACETE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Age > 18 years old • Signing of informed consent • Elective diagnostic cardiac catheterization with radial access intention. • 5 French sheath Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 608 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 60

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Allergy or intolerance to any of the medicines used in the study • Systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg • Inability to understand the study or to provide the informed consent • Patient under chronic oral anticoagulation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To assess the incidence of radial artery spasm and the gain of caliber with the use of different vasodilators and anaesthetic topic cream.;Secondary Objective: • To assess the radial-radial and radial-femoral crossover rate with each one of the strategies. • To evaluate the incidence of vaso-vagal reactions needing for treatment in each group of the study. • To assess different parameters related to pain during arterial puncture. • Subjective evaluation of pain and confortability perceived by patients through analogical scales and dedicated tests. • Subjective evaluation of difficulty in arterial puncture and grade of radial spasm perception by the operator through dedicated tests.;Primary end point(s): • Radial artery spasm • Gain of caliber according the formula: ((postVD MLD – preVD MLD)/ preVD MLD) x100 (VD: Vasodilator, MLD: Minimum Lumen Diameter);Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Cross-sectional study, only one visit

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): • Radial-Radial and Radial-Femoral crossover • Vaso-vagal reaction • Pain scales for patients • Confortability scales for patients • Difficulty scales for physicians;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Cross-sectional study, only one visit

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Public ContactMedical Department

ANTEIC, S.L.

beatriz.perez-zafrilla@anteic.com0034967119908

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026