Skip to content

Clinical Trial to evaluate the efficacy of the drug "Rigosertib" against non- melanoma skin cancer in "Butterfly Children".

A Phase II, Open Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Rigosertib in Patients with Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis bullosa associated Locally Advanced/Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma - Rigosertib for RDEB-SCC

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2016-003832-19-AT
Enrollment
12
Registered
2017-08-09
Start date
2017-12-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a severe genodermatose caused by mutations in COL7A1, characterized by generalized skin blistering and involvement of mucous membranes. Aggressive metastasizing squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) are a common complication, which reduce patients’ average life expectancy to less than 40 years. The aim of this study is to evaluate anti-tumor activity of oral Rigosertib, a PLK1 inhibitor, in RDEB patients diagnosed with SCCs.

Interventions

Product Name: Rigosertib Product Code: ON 01910.Na Pharmaceutical Form: Capsule, soft INN or Proposed INN: rigosertib CAS Number: 592542-60-4 Current Sponsor code: ON 01910.NA Other descriptive name:

Sponsors

Gemeinn. Salzburger Landeskliniken BetriebsGesmbH, University Hospital for Dermatology, EB-House Austria
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a) Diagnosis of RDEB confirmed by genetic testing or by a skin biopsy with immunofluorescence mapping (IFM). b) 18-79 years of age; c) Diagnosis of unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic SCC confirmed prior to the Screening Visit. d) Failure to respond to RDEB SCC standard of care, such as surgical excision, radiotherapy or conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy with e.g. platin derivates (i.e. cisplatin or carboplatin), 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, methotrexate, adriamycin, taxanes, gemcitabine or ifosfamide alone or in combination or failure to respond to previous alternative biologic treatments such as epidermal growth factor inhibitors (like cetuximab and panitumumab) or immune checkpoint (programmed cell death 1) inhibitors (such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab). For recent Guidelines on standard of care for RDEB SCC and non EB-SCC please see Mellerio et al., 2016; Stratigos et al., 2015 and Kim et al., 2018. e) Is not currently receiving any other cancer therapy. f) Measurable disease based on Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) g) Patient (or patient’s legally authorized representative) must have signed an informed consent indicating that the patient understands the purpose of and procedures required for the study and is willing to participate in the study. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 10 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a) Response to standard of care. b) Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, symptomatic congestive heart failure or unstable angina pectoris. c) Active systemic infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy. d) Total bilirubin = 1.5 mg/dL (=5.3 mg/dL in patients if related to hemolysis or Gilbert’s disease). e) Alanine transaminase (ALT)/aspartate transaminase (AST) = 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN). f) Serum creatinine =2 .0 mg/dL or eGFR (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate) <60 mL/min. g) White blood cell count = 2000/µl, neutrophils = 1500/µL, platelets = 100 x103/µL, hemoglobin = 7.9 g/dL. h) Known active HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C, where active is defined as follows: a. HIV or Hepatitis C – presence of viral load; b. Hepatitis B – antigen positive i) Uncorrected hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium value of <125 mmol/L). j) Male patients with partners of child-bearing potential who are unwilling to use male contraception (condom) throughout the study, up to and including the 30-day nontreatment follow-up period. k) Female subjects: pregnant or lactating women and all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant (i.e. women of childbearing potential) UNLESS they are willing to use one or more highly effective and reliable methods of contraception with a Pearl index =1 including combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral or intravaginal or transdermal); progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral or injectable or implantable); an intrauterine device (IUD); an intrauterine hormone-releasing system ( IUS); bilateral tubal occlusion; vasectomised Partner (provided that partner is the sole sexual partner of the WOCBP trial participant and that the vasectomised partner has received medical assessment of the surgical success) or sexual abstinence (The reliability of sexuality abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject). Reliable contraception should be maintained throughout the study. A pregnancy test in serum will be performed at screening in all women of childbearing potential, and in urine at all visits. Any postmenopausal women (physiologic menopause defined as “12 consecutive months of amenorrhea”) or women permanently sterilized (e.g. tubal occlusion, hysterectomy or bilateral salpingectomy) will not be required to undergo pregnancy test. l) Uncontrolled hypertension. (i.e.. systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 140mmHg and diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90mmHg despite intake of = 3 antihypertensive medications with complementary mechanisms of action (a diuretic should be 1 component); (Whelton et al., 2018). m) Patient is currently participating and receiving study therapy or systemic therapy or has participated in a study of an investigational agent and received study therapy or used an investigational device within 4 weeks of the first dose of treatment. n) Psychiatric illness or social situation that would limit the patient’s ability to tolerate and/or comply with study requirements. o) Patiens (or parents in case of paediatric subject) unlikely to comply with the study protocol or unable to understand the nature and scope of the study or the possible benefits or unwanted effects of the study procedures and treatments. p) History or current e

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To estimate the anti-tumor activity of rigosertib in RDEB patients with advanced SCC that has failed prior standard of care. Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of patients who achieve either a CR or a PR. ;Secondary Objective: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of oral rigosertib administered daily for three weeks on, one week off. To evaluate safety and tolerability of rigosertib applied via a 72-hr continous intravenous infusion on days 1, 2, and 3 of a 2-week cycle for the first eight 2-week cycles, then on days 1, 2, and 3 of a 4-week cycle thereafter. Assess impact on quality of life (QoL). Biomarker analysis (to include markers of PI3K/Akt and PLK1 pathways) performed on all archival tissue from all patients. Exome sequencing of patient tumors before, during and after treatment. ;Primary end point(s): The anti-tumor activity of rigosertib in RDEB patients with advanced SCC evaluated by overall response rate (ORR) which is defined as the proportion of patients who achieve either a CR or a PR. Safety and tolerability of rigosertib. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Anti-tumor activitiy: 12 weekly; final analysis after 52 weeks or when treatment stopped for whatever reason. Safety and Tolerability: weekly; final analysis after 52 weeks or when Treatment stopped for whatever reason.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Quality of life Biomarker Analysis;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Quality of life: weekly; final Analysis after 52 weeks or when treatment stopped for whatever reason. Biomarker Analysis: after week 25; final Analysis after 52 weeks or when treatment stopped for whatever reason.

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Public ContactClinical Trial Management

Gemeinn. Salzburger Landeskliniken BetriebsGesmbH, University Hospital for Dermatology, EB-House Austria

el.mayr@salk.at

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026