Skip to content

intranasal fentanyl versus oral morphine sulfate in the treatment of pain in pediatric trauma

Non-inferiority of intranasal fentanyl versus oral morphine sulfate in the treatment of pain in pediatric trauma : a controled randomized , single blind study - FINDOL

Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2016-003658-34-FR
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-01-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

traumatic pain

Interventions

Trade Name: Oramorph Product Name: sulfate de morphine Pharmaceutical Form: Oral solution Other descriptive name: MORPHINE SULFATE Concentration unit: mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre Concentration type:

Sponsors

University Hospital of Montpellier
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Patient aged between 4 years old and 15,3 years old -Acute pain in traumatic context with a suspicion of fracture for patient 6/10 defined with a face analogue scale and a visual analogic scale (the difference between the scales is not 7 years old : feeling pain >6 points and defined thanks to a visual analogic scale -Informed consent form signed by parents - Beneficiary of an european health protection Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: 82 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) no F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Antalgic ( II or III) within 4 hours before the inclusion Allergic or non-indication of fentanyl Allergic or contraindication of morphine sulfate pre Existing peripheral intravenous catheter Traumatic brain injury nasal traumatic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To assess the non inferiority of a treatment by Fentanyl intranasal vs morphin sulfate (oral use) in children suffering from traumatic pain ;Secondary Objective: to assess : Tolerability Feasability of the administation of the treatment onset of treatments efficacity ;Primary end point(s): Passessment of the pain feeling defined by Visual analogic scale (face scale and analogic scale);Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 45 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): 1.Onset of treatment efficacity 2.treatment failure 3.Adverse events ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 1. up to 45 minutes 2. Up to 1 hour 3. up to 48 hours

Countries

France

Contacts

Public ContactResearch Department _ sponsor Unit

Research Department of Montpellier Hospital

c-chauveton@chu-montpellier.fr0033467330924

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026