Skip to content

Flu vaccine in patients with Myasthenia Gravis

Influenza vaccination in patients with Myasthenia Gravis - Influenza vaccine in Myasthenia Gravis

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2016-003138-26-NL
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-08-08
Start date
2016-10-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myasthenia gravis

Interventions

Trade Name: Influenza vaccine Product Name: Influenza vaccine Pharmaceutical Form: Suspension for injection Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Suspension for injection Route of administration of the

Sponsors

LUMC
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Males and females aged above 18 years at the time of the injection. 2. Patient with ocular or generalized AChR MG and 3. A positive serologic test for AChR antibodies > 0.5 nmol/l in the past 4. Patient with prednisone dose lower than 30mg and stable (dose +/- 5mg) during the 3 months before participation; other immunosuppressive should be stable/unchanged. 5. A healthy control above 18 years at the time of injection with no immunosuppressive medication. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 40 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 8

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. MG patients with a severe form of MG (Grade 4 or 5 based on MGFA classification). 2. Myasthenic crisis in the last 3 months 3. Presence of a thymoma. 4. Planned thymectomy during the study period or within 12 months prior of the tetanus toxoid booster immunization. 5. Any confirmed or suspected immunosuppressive or immunodeficient condition not related to the treatment of MG, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, or a family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency. 6. History or evidence of administration of immunoglobulins within 3 months prior to the tetanus revaccination. 7. History or evidence of plasmapheresis within 3 months prior to the tetanus revaccination. 8. At high risk for aspiration. 9. Pulmonary: forced vital capacity reduced to less than 70% of predicted capacity. 10. History of allergic disease or reactions likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine. 11. History of relevant chronic degenerative, psychiatric, or neurological disorder other than MG. 12. Severe hepatic, renal or cardiac insufficiency. 13. Major congenital defects or serious chronic illness other than MG. 14. Pregnancy or desire to become pregnant during the study. 15. Use of vitamin-K antagonist or new anti-coagulants (NOACS) 16. The patient is unable to fill out the study questionnaires or be interviewed in Dutch, or is unable to undergo the tests needed for the study, or is unable to give informed consent for participation in the study. 17. The investigator can exclude patients for this trial which are deemed not suitable for any reason.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The main objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the humeral immune response after influenza revaccination in patients with MG with acetylcholine antibodies (AChR MG).;Secondary Objective: The secondary objectives are to determine if vaccination induces immunological or clinical exacerbation in patients with AChR MG.;Primary end point(s): Change in total influenza specific serum IgG titer in patients with AChR MG;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Clinical relevant change in clinical scores (2 points for MG-ADL, 3 points for the QMG and the MG composite). Approaches to look at the clinic: 1. The mean change of the test scores of the two groups (A+B vs. C+ D) 2. The number of patients who show a clinical relevant test on one of the tests en compare this number of patients between the groups. 3. If a patient shows a clinical relevant change on a test, to look whether this is also on the other tests en compare this number of patients between the two groups (A+B vs C+D). - Change in autoimmune antibody titers against AChR. - The effect of the pre-study medication (use of immunosuppressive medication) at the immunological response.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 4 weeks and 3 months

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactInfluenza study contact

LUMC

myasthenie@lumc.nl0071315262118

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026