Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Transoral Head and Neck Surgery followed by adjuvant Radio(chemo)therapy versus primary Radiochemotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer (TopROC)

Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Transoral Head and Neck Surgery followed by adjuvant Radio(chemo)therapy versus primary Radiochemotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer (TopROC)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2016-002163-34-DE
Enrollment
280
Registered
2017-06-14
Start date
2017-11-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10026184 Term: Malignant neoplasm of oropharynx System Organ Class: 100000004864

Interventions

Pharmaceutical Form: Concentrate for solution for infusion INN or Proposed INN: Cisplatin Other descriptive name: CISPLATIN Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration type: range Concentration

Sponsors

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Histologically proven SCC of the oropharynx; T1, N2a-c, M0; T2, N1-2c, M0; T3, N0-2c, M0, with only amendable to transoral resection) • Primary tumor must be resectable through transoral approach • p16 immunohistochemitry by local pathology or FFPE tissue must be available for central HPV diagnostic • Written and signed informed consent • Briefing through surgeon and radiation oncologist • ECOG PS =2, Karnofsky PS = 60 % • Age = 18 • Curative treatment intent • Adequate bone marrow function: leucocytes > 3.0 x 109/L, neutrophils > 1.5 x 109/L, platelets > 80 x 109/L, hemoglobin > 9.5 g/dL • Adequate liver function: Bilirubin =65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 154

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Prior invasive malignancy except controlled skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of cervix • Unknown primary (CUP), nasopharynx, hypopharynx, laryngeal or salivary gland cancer • Metastatic disease • Serious co-morbidity, e.g. high-grade carotid artery stenosis, congestive heart failure NYHA grade 3 and 4, liver cirrhosis CHILD C • Hemoglobin level <9.5g/dl within 4 weeks before randomization • Pregnancy or lactation • Women of child-bearing potential with unclear contraception • Previous treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, EGFR-targeting agents or surgery exceeding biopsy in head and neck • Concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs or participation in another clinical trial with any investigational drug within 30 days prior to study screening • Social situations that limit compliance with study requirements or patients with an unstable condition (e.g., psychiatric disorder, a recent history of drug or alcohol abuse, interfering with study compliance, within 6 months prior to screening) or otherwise thought to be unreliable or incapable of complying with the requirements of the protocol • Patients institutionalized by official means or court order • Deficient dental preservation status or not accomplished wound healing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of primary surgical versus non-surgical treatment of locally advanced, but transorally resectable oropharyngeal cancer in terms of time to local or locoregional failure or death from any cause (LRF) ;Secondary Objective: Effectiveness of primary surgical versus non-surgical treatment of locally advanced, but transorally resectable oropharyngeal cancer with respect to •overall and disease-free survival of both treatments •acute toxicity and late morbidity (including swallowing function) until 3 years after randomization •Quality of life •Cost-effectiveness/ cost-utility analysis ;Primary end point(s): Time to local or locoregional failure (LRF) (defined as time from randomization to local or locoregional failure or death from any cause, whatever occurs first);Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: treatment phase: at every visit according to protocol follow-up: every three months until 36 month, every 6 months until end of study

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): • Overall and disease-free survival • Therapy-associated toxicity including swallowing function • QoL and QALY • Direct and indirect costs ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: treatment phase: at every visit according to protocol follow-up: every three months until 36 month, every 6 months until end of study

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactStudy Coordinator

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde

cj.busch@uke.de00494074105236

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026