Skip to content

ASSESSMENT OF CONTRAST ENHANCED DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY

DUAL ENERGY CONTRAST ENHANCED DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IN COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, TOMOSINTESIS AND MR IMAGING IN WOMEN FOLLOW-UP FOR BREAST CARCINOMA - Cedm Breast Follow-up

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2016-001296-67-IT
Enrollment
150
Registered
2021-06-08
Start date
2016-07-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

WOMAN WITH BREAST CANCER MedDRA version: 21.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10006206 Term: Breast carcinoma NOS System Organ Class: 100000004864

Interventions

Trade Name: VISIPAQUE - 320 MG I/ML SOLUZIONE INIETTABILE FLACONE DA 100 ML Product Name: Visipaque Product Code: Iodixanolo Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for infusion

Sponsors

ISTITUTO NAZIONALE TUMORI - IRCCS FONDAZIONE PASCALE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a) female b) age> 18 years c) patients in follow-up for breast cancer d) breast recurrence suspicion by traditional imaging e) full information on the study and signed the informed consent to participation in the study f) execution of the exams at any time during the menstrual cycle g) estimated rate of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)> 60 mL/min/1.73m2, derived from serum creatinine assay within two weeks prior to study entry Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 100 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 50

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Absolute exclusion criteria a) presence of pacemakers or other devices in the chest wall b) inability to maintain an immobile position during the examination c) inflammatory skin diseases (psoriasis, eczema, etc.) d) pregnant or lactating e) the presence of tattoos on the affected area f) presence of piercing the nipple that cannot be removed g) internal/external devices that prevent the correct positioning of the patient h) metal / electronic, metal splinters i) the particular shape of the breast that prevents the execution of the examination (in particular breast too large) j) allergies to metals k) allergy to iodinated contrast and / or Gadolinium l) claustrophobia m) acute renal insufficiency of any severity due to the hepatorenal syndrome and / or settled in the pre-operative period for liver transplantation n) acute or chronic renal failure, moderate or severe (glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73m2) o) the presence of breast implants Criteria related exclusion a) micro-directed biopsy of ipsilateral breast within three months from the date of enrollment in the study b) needle aspiration in the ipsilateral breast within one month from the date of enrollment in the study c) oral contraceptives or hormonal treatment in the last 90 days d) d) the presence of open wounds or surgical clips

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Aim of the study is to assess the diagnostic performance of imaging obtained with new imaging methods represented by digital mammography (2D) with contrast medium (mdc) - DUAL ENERGY CONTRAST ENHANCED DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY - and Tomosynthesis (3D), in comparison of traditional 2D mammography and MRI with contrast medium (gold standard), in the follow-up of women operated for breast cancer, in order to assess the best diagnostic accuracy in the detection of recurrence.;Secondary Objective: To standardize the examination protocol of Dual Energy Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography with the drafting of new guidelines;Primary end point(s): 1) Superiority of CEDM and combination of CEDM and 3D compared to 2D digital mammography traditional and synthesized. Standards of truth is the result of the histo-pathological examination. 2) Non-inferiority of the combination compared to CEDM and 3D contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Standards of truth is the result of the histo-pathological examination. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: every 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Success in the detection of ipsilateral and/or contralateral recurrences with CEDM, 3D/2D, DCE-MRI in order to assess the performance in terms of sensitivity and positive predictive value for the different proposed strategies. Standards of truth is the result of the histo-pathological examination.; Evaluation of the incremental effectiveness of the various proposed strategies.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: every 12 months; every 12 months

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Public ContactSC Radiodiagnostica -degenze

ISTITUTO NAZIONALE TUMORI - IRCCS FONDAZIONE PASCALE

a.petrillo@istitutotumori.na.it0815903738

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026