suspected epilepsy
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Children 2 to 17 years of age sent to EEG examination during sleep because of suspected epilepsy. Written consent of participation in the study given by parents and children from 8 years of age. Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: 300 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) no F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Difficulties understanding swedish by children and/or parents. 2. Severe mental redardation of the child. 3. Known or suspected allergy to melatonin. 4. Liver or kidney falure; 5.Ongoing medication with kinolones, fluvoxamin, 5-och 8-metoxipsoralen, cimetidin, or oestrogenes. 6. Pregnancy or breast-feeding
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Main Objective: To compare sleep depivatiion and melatonin as sleep-inducing methods prior to sleep EEG in children with suspected epilepsy, with regard to prevalence of epileptiform activity;Secondary Objective: 1. To compare sleep depivatiion and melatonin as sleep-inducing methods prior to sleep EEG in children with suspected epilepsy, with regard to prevalence of sleep 2. To compare sleep depivatiion and melatonin as sleep-inducing methods prior to sleep EEG in children with suspected epilepsy, with regard to technical quality ocf EEG; 3. Examine associations between the age of the child, salivary cortisol and melatonin concentration prior to the EEG recording and the likelihood of the child falling asleep after melatonin ingestion vs. sleep deprivation. 4. To examine whether salivary levels of melatonin and cortisol are affected by sleep deprivation in children. 5. To identify factors of relevance for sleep and sleep quality in children of various ages between one and 16 years of age. 6. The experience of the investigation by children, parents and technicians.;Primary end point(s): Presence of epileptiform activity;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Day of investigation | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary end point(s): 1.. Presence of sleep during the examination. 2. Technical quality of the EEG recording. 3. The experince of the melatonin compared to sleep-deprived sleep-EEG by children, parents and technicians. 4. Cortisol and melatonin levels in saliva prior to melatonin intake. 5. Subjective sleep quality.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: the day of investigation | — |
Countries
Sweden
Contacts
Region Ostergotland