Skip to content

Study to assess the efficacy of homeopathic 2LALERG on symptoms of allergy to grass pollen

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to measure 2L®ALERG (homeopathic drug) efficacy on symptoms of allergic rhinitis and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in patients with a seasonal allergy to grass pollen - 2LALERG

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2016-000097-38-BE
Enrollment
100
Registered
2016-01-22
Start date
2016-02-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients: Allergic Rhinitis and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in patients with seasonal allergy to grass pollen

Interventions

Trade Name: 2LALERG Product Name: Cytokins complexe and SNA®-ALERG Ref "2LALERG" Pharmaceutical Form: Capsule Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Capsule Route of administration of the placebo: Sublin

Sponsors

Labo'Life
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Age =18 years, male and female - Symptomatic since at least two seasons and confirmed by positive skin test and/or the presence of IgE for grasses (prick test defined as positive if higher than or equal to half the negative control; IgE positive if at least class 3 (= 3.5 kU / L); these tests must have been performed at the latest at the first screening visit Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 80 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 20

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patient with an acute exacerbation of allergic rhinitis - Patient with uncontrolled asthma - Immunotherapy received within the last two years - Patient with a known lactose intolerance - Patient taking nasal or bronchial inhaled corticosteroids on a long term basis (intermittent consumption during the season is permitted provided it is mentioned in the patient’s records)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The main objective is to demonstrate the efficacy of 2L®ALERG versus placebo on the symptoms of allergic rhinitis and allergic rhino-conjunctivitis in patients with seasonal allergy to grass pollen.;Secondary Objective: The secondary objectives will be to compare the effect of 2L®ALERG versus placebo on: -Symptoms of allergy (not corrected by the use of rescue medication), -Use of rescue medication, -Evolution of the quality of life (QoL) using 3 daily specific questions included in the patient’s diary card: Did you sleep well? – Can you work normally? – How do you feel? -Safety (AEs and SAEs). ;Primary end point(s): The primary endpoint will be the area under the curve (AUC) of the overall score established according to the total 5 symptoms score (T5SS) and medication score (MS) according to time from the start of treatment until the end of the patient follow-up. The five symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhoea, nasal pruritus, eye itching and tearing, and nasal obstruction) will be assessed daily by patients on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) giving a total score ranging from 0 to15. The rescue medications (RM) allowed in the first-line adjuvant treatment will be codified to establish a score. The allowed RM are the oral antihistamines (two points per day of use) or local treatment (nasal or eye; a point per day), and the ocular cromoglycate (one point per day). In case of failure or in case of insufficiency of rescue medications mentioned above, the nasal topical corticosteroids (one point per day of use) will be allowed. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: End of Study: September 2016

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): The secondary endpoints will be: - Total 5 symptoms score (T5SS) and individual scores of 5 symptoms - Consumption of rescue medications - Evaluation of the QoL: AUC (total score of 3 questions of QoL included in the diary card on the Y-axis, and time on X axis) during the entire follow-up period - Frequency, severity and causality relationship of AEs and SAEs. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: End of Study: September 2016

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Public ContactClinical Trial Associate

ECSOR

marie.verbeeren@ecsor.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026