Skip to content

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of HOE901-U300 with Lantus in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

6-Month, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, 2-Arm, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a New Formulation of Insulin Glargine and Lantus® Injected Once Daily in Children and Adolescents age 6 - 17 Years with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with a 6-month Safety Extension Period - EDITION JUNIOR

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2015-002084-42-HU
Enrollment
564
Registered
2016-03-01
Start date
2016-04-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 diabetes mellitus MedDRA version: 19.0 Level: PT Classification code 10067584 Term: Type 1 diabetes mellitus System Organ Class: 10027433 - Metabolism and nutrition disorders

Interventions

Sponsors

sanofi-aventis recherche & développement
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) for at least 1 year confirmed by typical symptoms at diagnosis and/or by antibody testing (presence of anti-GAD [glutamic acid decarboxylase] or anti-IA2 [islet antigen 2/tyrosine phosphatase] or anti-islet cell antibodies) and/or clinical features (eg, history of ketoacidosis). -Signed written informed consent obtained from parent(s)/legal guardian and written or oral assent obtained from patient. Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: 31 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) no F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Age 11% at screening. -Initiation of any glucose-lowering medications in the last 3 months before screening visit. -Hospitalization or care in the emergency ward for diabetic ketoacidosis or history of severe hypoglycemia (as defined by need for glucagon or IV glucose) and accompanied by seizure and/or unconsciousness and/or coma in the last 3 months prior to screening visit. -Postmenarchal girls not protected by highly-effective method(s) of birth control and/or who are unwilling or unable to be tested for pregnancy. Abstinence from sexual intercourse will be considered as an acceptable form of birth control. -Pregnant or breast-feeding adolescents, or adolescents who intend to become pregnant during the study period, or who are at risk of getting pregnant due to any psychosocial reason during the study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To compare the efficacy of HOE901-U300 to Lantus in terms of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); Secondary Objective: -To compare HOE901-U300 and Lantus in terms of: -Percentage of patients reaching target HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). -To assess the safety of HOE901-U300 including analysis of events of hypoglycemia, events of hyperglycemia with ketosis, and development of anti-insulin-antibodies. ;Primary end point(s): Change from baseline in HbA1c;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Baseline; Week 26

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): 1- Percentage of patients with HbA1c values of <7.5% without any episode of severe and/or documented (SMPG <54 mg/dL; 3.0 mmol/L) symptomatic hypoglycemia during the last 3 months of the main 6-month on-treatment period 2- Change from baseline in FPG 3- Percentage of patients with FPG of =130 mg/dL (7.2 mmol/L) without any episode of severe and/or documented (SMPG =54 mg/dL; 3.0 mmol/L) symptomatic hypoglycemia during the last 3 months of the main 6-month 4- Change from baseline in 24-hour mean plasma glucose based on 8-point self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles 5- Change from baseline in variability of 24-hour mean plasma glucose based on 8-point SMPG profiles 6- Number (%) of patients with hypoglycemia 7- Number (%) of patients with hyperglycemia with ketosis 8- Number (%) of patients with adverse events ; Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 1- Week 26 2- Baseline; Week 26 3- Week 26 4- Baseline; Week 26 5- Baseline; Week 26 6- Up to Month 12 7- Up to Month 12 8- Up to Month 12

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

Public ContactNA.

sanofi-aventis Zrt.

kapcsolat@sanofi.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026