Skip to content

A comparative phase2 study assessing the efficacy of triheptanoin, an anaplerotic therapy in Huntington's Disease (TRIHEP 3)

A comparative phase2 study assessing the efficacy of triheptanoin, an anaplerotic therapy in Huntington's Disease (TRIHEP 3)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2014-005112-42-FR
Enrollment
50
Registered
2015-06-22
Start date
2015-06-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Huntington's disease MedDRA version: 18.0 Level: PT Classification code 10070668 Term: Huntington's disease System Organ Class: 10010331 - Congenital, familial and genetic disorders

Interventions

Sponsors

INSERM
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - positive genetic test with CAG repeat lenght = 39 in HTT gene - at lmeast 18 years of age - signature of informed consent - covered by social security - UHDRS score between 5 and 40 - Ability to undergo MRI scanning Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 100 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Hypersensitivity to triheptanoin or to one of its excipients - additional psychiatric or neurological conditions - severe head injury - Participation in another therapeutical trial ( 3 months exclusion period) - Pregnancy or breastfeeding - Inability to understand information about the protocol - persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or unable to consent - adult subject under legal protection or unable to consent - Patients under tetrabenazine and neuroleptics other than atypical neuroleptics at a small dose

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: the primary objectice is to evaluate the efficacy of triheptanoin in - increasing the energy response in the metabolic profile of the brain of early affected HD patients , as captured by 31-Phosphorus Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - slowing atrophy in the caudate of early affected HD patients as measured with volumetric resonance imaging;Secondary Objective: - to assess the clinical benefit of triheptanoin on motor function in HD patients using scores on the United Huntington's Disease Rating Scale - to assess the clinical benefit of triheptanoin on cognitive function ansd psychiatric symptoms in HD patients using scores on the symbol digit test, PBA-S and the HVLT-R - to assess the effect on quality of life (SF-36) of HD patients of therapeutic use of triheptanoin -to confirm long term clinical and biological tolerance of triheptanoin in HD patients - to evaluate long-term compliance with dietary modifications in HD patients - o look for correlations between neuroimaging volumetric parameters; brain energy profiles and clinical scores, beofre avec after treatment.;Primary end point(s): - an increase in the index of brain energy restoration as defined by the difference between Pi/PCr ration during visual stimulation and the mean of Pi/PCr ratio during rest and recovery using 31P-MRS after 3 months - a decrease in the rate of caudate atrophy, using volumetric MRI, after six months of treatment with triheptanoin in early HD patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): a) increase in the index of brain energy restoration using 31P-MRS b) decrease in the rate of caudate atrophy after 1 year of treatment with triheptanoin in early affected HD patient. c) the clinical benefit of triheptanoin will be evaluated by a decrease in the progression of the UHDRS over 6 months ans 1 year of treatment. d) it will be also evaluated using SMDT e) The benefit of triheptnaoin use on patient quality of life will be evaluated by using the SFR-36 f) long term compliance will be performed by regular bioclinical testing from blood abd urine samples g) Long term tolerance will be confirmed by clinical exam and by patient phone call h) changes in brain energy will be correlated with volumetric measures ans clinical rating scale scores. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: a) 6 months and 1 year of treatment b) 1 year c) 6 months and 1 year d) 1 year

Countries

France, Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactSonia GUEGUEN

INSERM

rqrc.siege@inserm.fr33144236041

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026