Skip to content

Is gabapentin more effective in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women than a dummy (placebo) drug?

GaPP 2: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of the efficacy and mechanism of action of gabapentin for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women - Gabapentin for Pelvic Pain (GaPP 2)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2014-005035-13-GB
Enrollment
300
Registered
2015-02-06
Start date
2015-02-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic pelvic pain of unknown cause MedDRA version: 17.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10048581 Term: Pelvic pain female System Organ Class: 100000004872

Interventions

Trade Name: Gabapentin Product Name: Gabapentin Pharmaceutical Form: Capsule INN or Proposed INN: Gabapentin CAS Number: 60142963 Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration type: equal Concentr

Sponsors

University of Edinburgh
Lead Sponsor
NHS Lothian
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Women aged between 18-50 years 2. Chronic pelvic pain (non-cyclical with or without dysmenorrhoea or dyspareunia) of >3 months duration 3. Pain located within the true pelvis or between and below anterior iliac crests 4. Associated functional disability 5. No obvious pelvic pathology at laparoscopy (2 weeks ago 6. Using or willing to use effective contraception if necessary to avoid pregnancy 7. Able to give written informed consent. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: 0 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 300 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 0

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Known pelvic pathology -Endometriosis (macrospcopic lesions) -complex or >5cm ovarian cyst -fibroid >3cm -dense adhesions 2. Worst pain score <4 out of 10 on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline (of the four measurements taken) 3. Current malignancy undergoing treatment 4. Past history of gabapentin/pregabalin use for CPP 5. Taking morphine and unable/unwilling to stop 6. Taking GnRH agonists and unable/unwilling to stop 7. Surgery of planned in next 6 months 8. History of significant renal impairment 9. Previous reaction to gabapentin 10. Breast feeding 11. Pregnant 12. Planned pregnancy in next 6 months 13. Pain suspected to be of gastrointestinal origin (positive Rome III Diagnostic Criteria) 14. Taking prohibited medications 15. Metal implant/pacemaker/claustrophobia (fMRI subgroup). 16. Co-enrolment in a CTIMP

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To test if women with chronic pelvic pain (where no cause for their pain has been found) can be safely treated with gabapentin to gain good pain relief.;Secondary Objective: To test if these women have a better quality of life when treated with gabapentin. Sub-study - Using functional MRI (fMRI) of the brain to see what effect the drug has on the brain.;Primary end point(s): Dual measures of worst and average pelvic pain scores assessed by a numerical rating scale (NRS) during the final 4 weeks of treatment (weeks 13-16 post-randomisation).;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Baseline and 13-16 weeks post randomisation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Physical/emotional functioning assessed using the following questionnaires: • SF-12 quality of life: Short Form Health Survey provides summary information on physical and mental health status. • Brief Pain Inventory: a comprehensive instrument for pain assessment • Fatigue Severity Scale: to measure the severity of fatigue in adults • General Health Questionnaire: to identify psychological distress • Work and Productivity Activity Impairment: a valid questionnaire for assessing impairments in paid work and activities • Pain catastrophizing scale: one of the most widely used instruments for measuring catastrophic thinking related to pain • Sexual Activity Questionnaires: The sexual activity questionnaire is a valid, reliable and acceptable measure for describing the sexual functioning of women in terms of pleasure and discomfort • PainDetect™: a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients 2. Central pain processing: Brain activity (fMRI) at rest and in response to noxious stimuli. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Baseline and 13-16 weeks post randomisation

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactAnn Doust

University of Edinburgh

ann.doust@ed.ac.uk01312429492

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026