Skip to content

CHEMO-RESECTION COMPARED WITH STANDARD TREATMENT FOR NMIBT

CHEMO-RESECTION WITH HYPERTHERMIC INTRAVESICAL INSTILLATION (HIVEC-R) VS STANDARD TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH NMIBT: COMPARATIVE, PROSPECTIVE AND RANDOMIZED STUDY OF EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY - HIVEC - R

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2014-005001-20-ES
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2015-03-03
Start date
2015-05-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NMIBT

Interventions

Sponsors

DR. ALEJANDRO SOUSA ESCANDÓN
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients with NMIBC for which TURB is indicated except those recurrent with previous T1G3 or CIS in the last 12 moths and positive cytology - WHO scale 0, 1, 2, 3 - Age ? 18 yrs - Normal kidneys and ureters - Pre-treatment haematology and biochemistry values within acceptable limits - Negative pregnancy test for women of child-bearing potential - Written informed consent (IC) Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 34 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 34

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patient with solid tumor and muscle infiltrating aspect or with associated plane lesions suspicious for CIS - Recurrent patients with previous T1G3 or CIS in the last 12 months and positive cytology - Patients with hypersensitivity or allergy to MMC - History of limited vesical capacity (<200cc) - UCC involving the prostatic urethra or upper urinary tract - Pregnant or lactating women or women of childbearing potential unwilling or unable to use adequate non-hormonal contraception - Other malignancy within the past five years, except: nonmelanomatous skin cancer cured by excision, adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or DCIS/LCIS of the breast or prostate cancer. cancer. - Patients with tumours histologically different tan transitional cell carcinoma - Patients that for any reason should receive concurrent chemotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: COMPARE EFFICACY OF NEOADJUNCTIVE THERAPY WITH CHEMO-HYPERTHERMIA WITH STANDARD ADJUNCTIVE THERAPY FOR NMIBT AT 24 MONTHS;Secondary Objective: EVALUATE EFFICACY OF NEOADJUNCTIVE THERAPY IN TERMS OF COMPLETE AND PARTIAL RESPONSE AND COMPARE TOLERABILITY, QOL AND COST EFFECTIVENESS OF BOTH TREATMENT REGIMES;Primary end point(s): DFSR (Disease Free Survival Rate);Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Cytoscopy at week 4 and at 4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment completion

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Complete and partial response of neoadjunctive therapy, tolerability, quality of life and cost effectiveness;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Cytology at week 4, side effects reported by patient and healthcare professional before and after every instillation, qol questionnaire at screening visit and last visit.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Public ContactDR. ALEJANDRO SOUSA ESCANDÓN

HOSPITAL COMARCAL DE MONFORTE

sousa-alejandro@hotmail.com+34607856407

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026