Skip to content

Pharma-economic comparison regarding the use of medicines to control the levels of Phosphate in the blood in patients suffering from Chronic Kidney Disease associated with mineral and bone disorder.

Randomized controlled trial of two different combinations of Calcium-containing Phosphate binders (Ca-PiB) plus non-Calcium-non-Aluminum containing Phosphate binders (no-Ca-Al-PiB): a pharma-economic approach. - OSvaren vs CAlcium carbonate Research - OSCAR

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2014-004340-35-IT
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2014-12-16
Start date
2015-03-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperphosphatemia associated with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) in patients undergoing hemodialysis. MedDRA version: 17.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10020712 Term: Hyperphosphatemia System Organ Class: 100000004861

Interventions

Trade Name: Osvaren 435 mg/235 mg film-coated tablets Pharmaceutical Form: Coated tablet INN or Proposed INN: Calcium acetate CAS Number: 62-54-4 Other descriptive name: CALCIUM ACETATE ANHYDROUS Conc

Sponsors

Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Male and female patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD5D) in HD treatment with scheduled three sessions/week since at least three months / Age >18 years old / Serum Phosphate >5.5 mg/dl without P binders prescription OR serum Phosphate >5,5 mg/dl at the end of first wash-out week, if P binders were prescribed OR serum Phosphate >5,5 mg/dl at the end of second wash-out week, in case serum P values are not >5,5 mg/dl at the end of first wash-out week, if P binders were prescribed OR patients previously selected for the enrollment if Serum Phosphate >5,5 mg/dl after the second wash-out week, at any time during the six months after the first patient being enrolled at the center / If the patient is a female of childbearing potential, she is using an acceptable method of contraception during the study period. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 70 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 160

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe hyperphosphatemia despite the use of P binders (serum P >8 mg/dl) / Severe hyperparathyroidism (defined as PTH levels >9 times superior to normal level, by definition of KDIGO guidelines) according to Patient’s Medical History / PTH levels excessively suppressed (10 mg/dl, according to Patient’s Medical History / Poor compliance, upon Investigator’s opinion / Inadequate dialysis at screening (Kt/V< 1.2 or URR< 65%) / Oral anticoagulants intake / Malignancy with survival perspective <1 year / Active autoimmune diseases treated with steroids / Pregnancy at time of enrolment / Refusal of consent to participate / Contraindications or hypersensitivity to the Investigational Product (elevated sMg levels of more than 2 mmol/l (4,85 mg/dl), and/or symptoms of hypermagnesaemia / AV-block III° / Myasthenia gravis).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of Osvaren in maintaining serum phosphate levels <5.5 mg / dl, reaching an optimal level of 4.5 mg / dl, in comparison with Calcium carbonate, with a potential sparing effect on the use of Calcium-free Phosphate binders through their delayed introduction in the therapy.;Secondary Objective: To evaluate the progression of vascular calcifications and the occurrence of vertebral fractures in patients treated.;Primary end point(s): Time lag (days) from the start of the study (week 0) to the day of possible introduction of a Calcium/Aluminum-free Phosphate binder (Sevelamer / Lanthanum carbonate). This will be translated into a pharma-economic difference in the cost of treatment, taking into account the drug and dose used in the individual patient.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Evaluations during the whole study period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): 1) Progression of abdominal aorta vascular calcifications, through Kauppila scoring system / 2) Characterization of vertebral fractures, through quantitative vertebral morphometry / 3) Measurement of optimal serum Magnesium concentration (safety outcome).;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 1) Baseline vs Half vs End of treatment period / 2) Baseline vs Half vs End of treatment period / 3) Evaluations during the whole study period.

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Public ContactClinical Operations

Sintesi Research Srl

info@sintesiresearch.com003902873512

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026