Skip to content

Does morphine provide effective pain relief during painful procedures performed in newborn babies as part of their essential medical care?

A blinded randomised placebo-controlled trial investigating the efficacy of morphine analgesia for procedural pain in infants - Is morphine an effective analgesic for procedural pain in infants?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2014-003237-25-GB
Enrollment
156
Registered
2015-07-20
Start date
2015-08-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity is an essential yet painful routine test that is performed multiple times in infants who are born prematurely. Premature infants also regularly require heel lance for blood tests. We will conduct a randomised placebo-controlled trial to examine whether morphine is an effective analgesic for these procedures.

Interventions

Product Name: Morphine sulphate Oral solution 200mcg in 1mL Product Code: n/a Pharmaceutical Form: Oral solution INN or Proposed INN: morphine sulphate 200mcg in 1ml oral solution Concentration unit

Sponsors

University of Oxford
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The study will be conducted in the neonatal unit at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford. Inclusion Criteria • Participants will be in-patients on the neonatal unit at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford. • Infants born less than 32 weeks’ gestation or birth weight =65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 0

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion Criteria: • intraventricular haemorrhage > grade II • short bowel syndrome • receiving nil by mouth due to documented gut pathology • received opiates in the last 72 hours • received other analgesics or sedatives in the last 24 hours • previously documented episode of morphine sensitivity • congenital malformation or genetic condition known to affect neurological development • born to mothers who regularly use opiates during pregnancy or while breastfeeding or expressing breast milk.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To test whether administration of morphine reduces clinical pain scores (PIPP-R) compared with a placebo (inactive solution) 30 seconds after an eye examination to test for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). To test whether administration of morphine reduces pain-related brain activity compared with a placebo (inactive solution) following a clinically-essential heel lance. ;Secondary Objective: To test whether administration of morphine improves clinical stability after ROP screening in the 6-hour and 24-hour period following the start of the examclinical intervention (heel lance followed by retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening). To test whether administration of morphine reduces clinical pain scores (PIPP-R) and motor reflex withdrawal activity compared with a placebo (inactive solution) following a clinically-essential heel lance compared with a placebo (inactive solution). To test whether administration of morphine is safe by determining whether it results in episodes of respiratory depression or hypotension that require intervention compared with a placebo. ;Primary end point(s): Primary outcome measure: Clinical pain score (PIPP-R) score 30seconds after ROP screening. Co-primary outcome measure: Magnitude of nociceptive-specific brain activity evoked by heel lance.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Primary outcome measure: 30 seconds after ROP screening Co-primary outcome measure: Immediately following heel lance

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): (1) Clinical stability in the 6-hour and 24-hour period following the start of the clinical intervention (heel lance followed by ROP screening). (Clinical stability assessment is calculated from pulse oximetry and blood pressure recordings and the need for increased respiratory support.) (2) Premature infant pain profile-Revised (PIPP-R) score and amplitude of reflex withdrawal following heel lance. (3) Drug safety will be assessed by calculating the number of incidences of apnoea that require intervention using NeoPuff or ‘bag and mask’ and the number of incidences of hypotension that requires treatment with inotropes in the 24-hour period following the administration of the IMP or placebo. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: (1) Clinical stability: 24-hours after ROP screening. (2) Premature infant pain profile-revised (PIPP-R) score and amplitude of reflex withdrawal: immediately following heel lance. (3) Drug safety: 24-hour period following the administration of the IMP or placebo.

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactMs Heather House

University of Oxford

heather.house@admin.ox.ac.uk01865572224

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026