Skip to content

Endoscopic treatment of neoplasia in the upper urinary tract and the value of fluorescence guided endoscopic follow up.

Endoscopic treatment of neoplasia in the upper urinary tract and the value of fluorescence guided endoscopic follow up.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2014-000669-39-DK
Enrollment
20
Registered
2014-04-09
Start date
2014-06-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-09-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urothelial tumors in the renal pelvis MedDRA version: 17.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10038517 Term: Renal pelvis cancer NOS System Organ Class: 100000004864

Interventions

Trade Name: Gliolan Pharmaceutical Form: Granules and solvent for oral suspension INN or Proposed INN: 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride CAS Number: 5451-09-2 Other descriptive name: AMINOLEVULINIC

Sponsors

Gregers Gautier Hermann
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Low grade (WHO grade 1 or 2) tumours in the upper urinary tract. -Patients with urothelial tumours and where RNU (radical nephroureterectomy) cannot be performed (due to one kidney, horseshoe shaped kidney, bilateral disease or co-morbidity which makes bigger surgery impossible) -Tumour limited to renal pelvis and one calyx or limited to two calyxes Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 10 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 10

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Patients with porphyria -Macroscopic haematuria, as it might interfere with the fluorescence guided cysto-ureteroscopy -Known hypersensitivity to 5-ALA or porphyrins -Pregnant or breast-feeding women (women of childbearing age will have a pregnancy test) -Expected poor study compliance -Patients < 18 years -Patients who do not read or understand Danish

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: - Primary Objective: To evaluate the overall clinical effect of the method. - Secondary Objective: To evaluate whether PDD guided uretero/nephroscopy is superior to standard white light diagnosis of UUTT. -Tertiary Objective: To demonstrate that biopsies from the upper urinary tract system have proper quality for histological diagnosis. -Quarterly Objective: To record adverse events to the study method used for diagnose and treatment of UUTT. ;Secondary Objective: The trial has no more objectives;Primary end point(s): -Number of patients with tumours at 4 month follow up nephro-ureteroscopy after tumour clearance of the pelvis -Number of patients who avoid RNU -Overall diagnosis made by nephro-ureteroscopy ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Study will run for approximately 3 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): -Number of neoplastic lesions in the ureter and renal pelvis/calyces recorded by white light versus lesions recorded by PDD. - Sensitivity and specificity of white light diagnosis and PDD. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: after 3 years

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Public Contactconsultant

Gregers G Hermann

gregers.gautier.hermann@regionh.dk

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026