Skip to content

Study that randomly compares a treatment with the patients own blood cells with the standard therapy given for skin cancer

Randomized phase III study comparing a non-myeloablative lymphocyte depleting regimen of chemotherapy followed by infusion of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and interleukin-2 to standard ipilimumab treatment in metastatic melanoma - Lymphodepletion, TIL and Interleukin 2 compared to ipilimumab

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2013-005406-54-DK
Enrollment
168
Registered
2014-03-27
Start date
2014-05-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with unresectable and metastatic (stage IIIc and stage IV) melanoma will be randomized to either treatment arm A (ipilimumab) or treatment arm B (TIL) after metastasectomy and feasibility of culturing of TIL. MedDRA version: 21.1 Level: PT Classification code 10025670 Term: Malignant melanoma stage III System Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10027481 Term: Metastatic melanoma

Interventions

Trade Name: Yervoy Pharmaceutical Form: Infusion INN or Proposed INN: IPILIMUMAB Other descriptive name: Yervoy Concentration unit: mg/kg milligram(s)/kilogram Concentration type: equal Concentration

Sponsors

Antoni van Leeuwenhoek ziekenhuis
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Histologically confirmed unresectable AJCC stage III or stage IV melanoma • Patients must have metastatic melanoma with a resectable metastatic lesion(s) of sufficient size (= 2-3 cm in total) and must be willing to undergo such a resection for experimental purposes. Resected metastases during stage IV disease that were removed at much earlier time points, but were used to grow clinical grade TIL up to Rapid Expansion Protocol may be used as well with informed consent of the patient. • Patients should have received no previous systemic therapy for unresectable or metastatic melanoma or one line of any kind of systemic treatment, except for ipilimumab.[Note that prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant melanoma therapy is permitted if it was completed at least 6 weeks prior to randomization,and all related adverse events have either returned to baseline or stabilized.] • Patients must be = 18 years and = 75 years of age and must have measurable disease by CT or MRI per RECIST 1.1 criteria (in addition to the resected lesion). • Patients must have a clinical performance status of ECOG 0 or 1. • Patients of both genders must be willing to practice a highly effective method of birth control during treatment and for four months after receiving the preparative regimen. • Patients must be able to understand and sign the Informed Consent document. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 144 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 24

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Life expectancy of less than three months. • Patients with metastatic ocular/ mucosal or other non-cutaneous melanoma. • Adjuvant treatment with ipilimumab within 6 months prior to randomization. • Requirement for immunosuppressive doses of systemic corticosteroids (>10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) or other immunosuppressive drugs within the last 3 weeks prior to randomization. • Patients who have a more than two CNS metastases. • Patients who have any CNS lesion that is symptomatic, greater than 1 cm in diameter or show significant surrounding edema on MRI scan will not be eligible until they have been treated and demonstrated no clinical or radiologic CNS progression for at least 2 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: to compare progression free survival (according to RECIST 1.1) at 6 months between patients treated with ipilimumab as compared to patients treated with TIL therapy.;Secondary Objective: -Progression free survival (according to RECIST 1.1 and irRC). Overall response rate according RECIST version 1.1 and irRC, complete response rate, overall survival and safety (according to CTCAE v. 4.0). -To evaluate the impact of the TIL treatment on patient, organizational and economic consequences, a constructive technology assessment (CTA) will be performed. In this CTA, Health Related Quality of Life is evaluated using a questionnaire. Additionally, patient impact of receiving TIL treatment is evaluated by a semi-structured interview with patients receiving TIL treatment and finally the incremental costs per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained will be estimated (cost-effectiveness).;Primary end point(s): The primary endpoint is progression free survival (according to RECIST 1.1) at 6 months.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: After 6 months of follow-up of the last patient.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): The secondary endpoints are PFS (according RECIST to irRC), the overall response rate, complete response rate, overall survival and safety. Health Related Quality of Life is evaluated using a questionnaire. Additionally, patient impact of receiving TIL treatment is evaluated by a semi-structured interview with patients receiving TIL treatment and finally the incremental costs per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained will be estimated (cost-effectiveness).;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: After 5 years of follow-up

Countries

Denmark, Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactBiometrics department

Antoni van Leeuwenhoek ziekenhuis

l.pronk@nki.nl31205122667

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026