Skip to content

To understand how easily patients learn to use and maintain correct use of BF Spiromax compared to Symbicort Turbohaler.

A 12 Week, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Mastery of Inhaler Technique for Budesonide Formoterol (BF) Spiromax(160/4.5 and 320/9 mcg) as Compared to SYMBICORT® TURBOHALER® (200/6 and 400/12 mcg) as Treatment for Adult Patients with Asthma (the Easy Low Instruction Over Time [ELIOT] Study)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2013-004630-14-GB
Enrollment
500
Registered
2013-12-06
Start date
2014-01-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Persistent asthma MedDRA version: 17.0 Level: SOC Classification code 10038738 Term: Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders System Organ Class: 10038738 - Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders

Interventions

Product Name: Budesonide/formoterol (BF) SPIROMAX (budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate 160/4.5 mcg) Product Code: BF Spiromax Pharmaceutical Form: Inhalation powder INN or Proposed INN: BUDESONID

Sponsors

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a. Written informed consent/assent is obtained: For adult patients, written informed consent signed and dated by the patient before conducting any study related procedures. b. The patient is a man or woman 18 through 75 years of age as of the screening visit. c. The patient has a diagnosis of asthma in accordance with Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria as evidenced by a UK quality outcome framework approved Read code (UK diagnostic coding system). d. The patient is receiving step 3 or 4 therapy for asthma as defined by the BTS guidelines (daily doses of BDP-equivalent ICS =800 mcg to 2000 mcg as part of fixed or free combinations with LABA). e. The patient does not have an ongoing asthma exacerbation. f. Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal) must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after discontinuation of study drug. Acceptable methods of contraception include intrauterine device (IUD) known to have a failure rate of less than 1% per year, steroidal contraceptive (oral, implanted, transdermal, or injected), barrier method with spermicide, abstinence, and partner vasectomy. g. The patient must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions and to remain at the clinic for the required duration during the study period, and willing to return to the clinic for the follow up evaluation as specified in this protocol. h. The patient is SPIROMAX and TURBOHALER naïve (no use of a TURBOHALER device in the last 6 months, minimizing carryover from prior device use). The following criteria apply to stage 2 of this study: i. Patient has uncontrolled or partly controlled asthma (using GINA criteria). j. Patient has demonstrated at least 1 error in current device inhaler technique. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 400 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 100

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a. The patient has any clinically significant uncontrolled medical condition (treated or untreated). b. The patient has participated in a Teva sponsored clinical study with BF SPIROMAX in the last 6 months. c. The patient is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any woman becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.) d. The patient has used an investigational drug within 1 month before the screening visit. e. The patient has received OCS and/or antibiotics for a lower respiratory condition in the 2 weeks preceding visit 1A (proxy measure for identifying an asthma exacerbation and/or lower respiratory infection, suggestive of altered inspiratory capabilities). f. The patient is currently receiving any OCS (including long or short courses). g. The patient has a significant chronic lower respiratory tract disease other than asthma eg chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis or interstitial lung disease. Conditions that are not predominant, such as minor degrees of bronchiectasis, are not a reason for exclusion. The following criteria apply to stage 2 of this study: h. The patient is unable to achieve mastery of both BF SPIROMAX and SYMBICORT TURBOHALER. i. The patient has controlled asthma (using GINA criteria). j. The patient demonstrates an absence of errors in current device inhaler technique.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: This is a 2 stage study. The primary objectives of the study are as follows: •stage 1: to determine the proportion of patients achieving device mastery by the end of step 3 of a 6 step standardized device training protocol for empty SPIROMAX is superior to empty TURBOHALER devices. Device mastery is defined as absence of nurse-observed errors. •stage 2: to determine whether the proportion of patients maintaining device mastery, in patients receiving ICS/LABA via BF SPIROMAX, is superior to ICS/LABA received via SYMBICORT TURBOHALER. Maintenance of device mastery is defined as absence of nurse-observed errors after 12 weeks of device use. ;Secondary Objective: The secondary objectives of the study-Stage 1 of this study: •proportion of patients achieving device mastery by step 1 •proportion of patients achieving device mastery by step 2 •number of steps required to achieve device mastery •number of nurse-observed errors •number of inhaler technique errors •patient preference of device using the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire Stage 2 of this study: •proportion of patients maintaining device mastery relating to dose preparation errors •total no of observed errors (nurse and technology [Vitalograph™ pneumotrac spirometer]) •number of technology-observed errors (Vitalograph pneumotrac spirometer) •no of handling errors •difference in number of handling errors identified following training using the patient information leaflet at stage 1 and after 12 weeks of treatment (end of stage 2) •treatment adherence assessed by device counters •efficacy of budesonide/formoterol treatment ;Primary end point(s): Primary Measures and Endpoints: This is a 2-stage study. The primary measures and endpoints of the study are as follows: •stage 1: proportion of patients achieving device mastery. Device mastery is defined as absence of nurse-observed errors by the end of step 3 of a 6 step standardized device training protocol for empty SPIROMAX compared

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Secondary Measures and Endpoints: The secondary measures and endpoints for this study are as follows: Stage 1 •proportion of patients achieving device mastery by step 1 •proportion of patients achieving device mastery by step 2 •number of steps required to achieve device mastery •number of nurse-observed errors •number of inhaler technique errors •PASAPQ score Stage 2 •proportion of patients maintaining device mastery relating to dose preparation errors •total number of observed errors (nurse and technology [Vitalograph pneumotrac spirometer]) •number of technology-observed errors (Vitalograph pneumotrac spirometer) •number of handling errors •difference in number of handling errors identified following training using patient information leaflet at stage 1 and after 12 weeks of treatment (end of stage 2) •treatment adherence (assessed by device counters) •efficacy of budesonide/formoterol treatment as assessed by the following: -change in 6 item ACQ (excluding FEV1 question) from baseline to 4, 8, and 12 weeks -change in 7 item ACQ (including FEV1 question) from baseline to week 12 -time to treatment failure (defined as change of asthma treatment or treatment for an asthma exacerbation or lower respiratory tract infection) -number of severe asthma exacerbations (defined as a hospitalization or emergency room attendance for asthma, or an acute course of OCS) -impact of maintaining device mastery on time to treatment failure (defined as change of asthma treatment or treatment for an asthma exacerbation or lower respiratory tract infection) and asthma control ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Data to evaluate the stage 2 endpoint will be collected during visit 2 at 12 weeks

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactClinical Trial Information Desk

Teva Pharma GmbH

Info-era-clinical@teva.de000000000000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026