Skip to content

Sedation With Propofol or Midazolam/Fentanyl by endoscopy nurses for endoscopic examination of the lungs.A clinical randomized trial on safety and satisfaction

Nurse Administered Propofol Sedation vs. Midazolam- with Fentanyl-sedation for Flexible Bronchoscopy: A randomized, Single Blind, Controlled Study of Safety and Satisfaction. - Safety of NAPS vs standard sedation for fleksible broncoscopy.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2013-004358-12-DK
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2013-11-22
Start date
2013-12-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Satisfaction and safety of propofol sedation during flexible bronchoscopy in patients undergoing endoscopic pulmonary investigation. MedDRA version: 17.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10049683 Term: Monitored anesthesia care sedation System Organ Class: 100000004865

Interventions

Sponsors

Gentofte Hospital, Dep. of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Elective flexible bronchoscopy. 2. Willing to be randomised 3. Provide written informed consent Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 100 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 56

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Allergy to contents administered 2. pregnant or nursing 3. ASA II 8. Sleep apnea 9. Risk of aspiration 10. Previously difficulty with anesthesia 11. Difficult airway

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To investigate satisfaction with sedation during flexible bronchoscopy. ;Secondary Objective: To study safety of endoscopy nurse administered propofol sedation during flexible bronchoscopy. ;Primary end point(s): Pre-morbid psyche evaluation Satisfaction score Willingness to repeat. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: after inklusion of 128 patients. estimated 14 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Frequency of adverse events: Hypoxia, hypo/hypertension, arrythmias, airway handling, intubation. Time to discharge. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: after inklusion of 128 patients. estimated 14 months.

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Public ContactJeppe Thue Jensen

Herlev Hospital, Gastrounit D, Endoscopy

jeppe.thue.jensen.01@regionh.dk004526136032

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026