Skip to content

Regenerating the cornea through transplantation of limbal stem cells

Translational stem cell research in ophthalmology - regenerating the anterior cornea through standardized transplantation of limbal epithelial stem cells: a phase II multicenter trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2013-004247-24-BE
Enrollment
60
Registered
2013-12-04
Start date
2015-01-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary and secondary Limbal Stem Cell Deficiencies MedDRA version: 17.1 Level: PT Classification code 10069798 Term: Amniotic membrane graft System Organ Class: 10042613 - Surgical and medical procedures MedDRA version: 17.1 Level: PT Classification code 10072138 Term: Limbal stem cell deficiency System Organ Class: 10015919 - Eye disorders

Interventions

Product Name: Limbal Epithelial Cell (LEC) graft Product Code: LEC Pharmaceutical Form: Ophthalmic insert INN or Proposed INN: LEC Current Sponsor code: LEC Other descriptive name: Limbal Epithelial C

Sponsors

Antwerp University Hospital (UZA)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Voluntary written informed consent 2. Patients suffering from LSCD IIa and IIb. Those suffering from IIc may be included once inflammation has subsided and cornea can be staged as IIb. 3. Absence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial. 4. Women of child-bearing potential should use adequate contraception prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Negative serum or urine ß-HCG pregnancy test at screening. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 30 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 30

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subjects who are pregnant or lactating 2. Subjects who have sensitivity to drugs that provide local anesthesia 3. Subjects suffering from active infection of the external eye 4. Medical conditions that prohibit the use of systemic immunosuppression (in cases of allogenic transplantation)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the success rate of transplanting non-xenogenic, bioengineered, composite grafts of cultured limbal epithelial stem cells on standardized amniotic membranes – in patients with LSCD. Based on the past experience from our phase I/II monocenter clinical trial, our primary hypothesis is that it will be well-tolerated, and not associated with serious adverse side effects. Assuming a success percentage of 67% based on our previous study, a sample size of 60 patients produces a two-sided 95% confidence interval with a width equal to 0.238. The larger sample size and inclusion of more allogenic transplant recipients, together with a longer follow-up, will help ascertain safety and efficacy of the proposed treatment.;Secondary Objective: The secondary objective of this study is to develop and implement a sub-clinical Ocular Surface Inflammation Monitoring (OSIM) tool based on biomarkers in tear samples. Further we would like to improve intra-operative visibility for the surgeon by introducing FD-OCT assisted pannus dissection prior to limbal stem cell transplantation. We further wish to introduce improved non-contact methods for transplanted corneal epithelial thickness monitoring and graft tracking via FD-OCT assisted follow-up. ;Primary end point(s): We will assess the success rate of transplanted limbal stem cells by a clinical observation of: Short term: 1. Increased visual acuity 2. Absence of conjunctivalization 3. Resolution of corneal vascularization 4. Absence of persistent epithelial defect 5. Decreased pain 6. Decreased photophobia Long term: 1. Prolonged subsequent corneal graft survival time ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Monitoring will be performed according to a fixed time schedule: * First month: weekly * Months 1, 2, 3, 6 * Every six months thereafter until minimun of 2 years follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): 1. Development and implementation of a sub-clinical Ocular Surface Inflammation Monitoring (OSIM) tool based on biomarkers in tear samples 2. Implementation of FD-OCT assisted limbal stem cell transplantation and post operative follow-up 3. Time until complete corneal epithelization is visualised using slit lamp 4. Presence or absence of normal corneal epithelial thickness using FD-OCT 5. Determine evolution of corneal pachymetry over time 6. Determine evolution of corneal epithelial thickness over time 7. In cases where a second operation needs to be preformed for improved visual rehabilitation, for example, penetrating keratoplasty, the removed corneal button will be sent for immunohistopathology in order to provide further insight into disease progression. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Monitoring will be performed according to a fixed time schedule: * First month: weekly * Months 1, 2, 3, 6 * Every six months thereafter until minimun of 2 years follow-up

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Public ContactNadia Zakaria

Antwerp University Hospital (UZA)

nadia.zakaria@uza.be003238214066

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026