Skip to content

Adductor canal block and effect of volume on muscle strength in healthy volunteers

Adductor canal block and effect of 10 versus 30 ml ropivacaine on muscle strength: a randomized study in helathy volunteers

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2013-003522-83-DK
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2013-10-04
Start date
2013-10-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

healthy volunteers (treatment intended for postoperative pain treatment in patients after knee surgery) MedDRA version: 16.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10054711 Term: Postoperative pain System Organ Class: 100000004863

Interventions

Trade Name: Ropivacaine Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection INN or Proposed INN: ROPIVACAINE CAS Number: 84057-95-4 Concentration unit: mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre Concentration type: equal

Sponsors

Professor Jørgen B. Dahl
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 18-30 years Men ASA 1 Body Mass Index 18-25 Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 26 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Allergy to study medication Earlier trauma or surgery to the lower limb Diabetes Mellitus

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To investigate whether reducing the volume (30 versus 10 ml) ropivacaine injected can reduce the number of subjects with impaired muscle strength following adductor canal block;Secondary Objective: To investigate wheteher reducing the volume ropivacaine injected for adductor canal block has any effect on ambulation and reduces sensory effect of the block;Primary end point(s): The difference between the two volumes in number of subjects excperiencing a reduction in quadriceps muscle strength by more than 25% from baseline in two consecutive assessments. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: From 30 minutes to 6 hours post block

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): A: The difference between the two volumes in maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the quadriceps muscle, assessed as percentage of the baseline value. B: The difference between the two volumes in maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the quadriceps muscle calculated as ”area under the curve” (AUC) C: The difference between the pre block value and the post block value in the modified 30-second Chair Stand test on one leg, between the two volumes. D: The difference between the two volumes in VAS pain score during warmth stimulation ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: A: 2, 3 and 4 hours post block B: Area under the curve for the interval 30 minutes to 6 hours post block C: Difference from pre block value at 2 and 4 hours post block D: Mean value for the periode 30 minutes - 6 hours post block

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Public ContactClinical Trials Information

Professor Jørgen B. Dahl

pia.therese.jaeger@regionh.dk0045 35453478

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026