Skip to content

A comparison of effIcacy and safety between the two drugs in patients with sore throat in order to demonstrate that their efficacy and safety is equivalent

A COMPARISON OF THERAPEUTIC EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN THE TEST AND THE REFERENCE FORMULATION OF FIXED COMBINATION OF CETYLPYRIDINIUM CHLORIDE 1.0 mg/BENZYDAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE 3 mg IN SUBJECTS WITH SORE THROAT ASSOCIATED WITH UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2013-002970-32-SI
Enrollment
340
Registered
2013-11-21
Start date
2013-12-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sore throat associated with upper respiratory infections MedDRA version: 16.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10041368 Term: Sore throat NOS System Organ Class: 10038738 - Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders MedDRA version: 16.1 Level: PT Classification code 10068319 Term: Oropharyngeal pain System Organ Class: 10038738 - Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders

Interventions

Product Name: Septolete total Pharmaceutical Form: Lozenge INN or Proposed INN: CETYLPYRIDINIUM CHLORIDE CAS Number: 123-03-5 Other descriptive name: CETYLPYRIDINIUM CHLORIDE Concentration unit: mg mi

Sponsors

KRKA, tovarna zdravil, d. d., Novo mesto
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Subjects with a sore throat associated with upper respiratory trat infection • Onset of sore throat = 6 days • Both sexes, age range 18-65 years • = 4 points on the 10 point Tonsillopharyngitis assessment (TPA) score • Moderate to severe sore throat pain defined as a score = 60 mm on the 100 mm Sore Throat Pain Intensity Scale Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 340 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 340

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Pregnancy or lactation or unreliable contraceptive method • Subjects with any evidence of mouth breathing or coughing which could compromise respiratory function and worsen sore throat • Severe streptococcal tonsillitis assessed by rapid antigen detection test (RADT) • Increased body temperature that needs antipyretic treatment (more than 38.5 C) • Recurrent (chronic) sore throat • Other severe respiratory tract diseases (pneumonia, infectious mononucleosis, asthma or difficulty in breathing, peritonsillar abscess etc.) • Oropharyngeal lesions (tumours, purulent necrotic process, aphtous ulcers, etc.) • Pharmacological therapy with: - Antibiotics currently, - oral antiseptics and demulcents in the form of sprays, gargles, lozenges or drops within 3 h before the initial dose, - short-acting analgesics within 6 hours before the initial dose, - long-acting or slow-release analgesic within 24 hours before the initial dose, - local anaesthetics within 4 hours before the initial dose, - antihistamines within 12 hours before the initial dose, - nasal decongestants, anti-tussives or expectorants including their fixed combinations within 8 hours before the initial dose. • Any chronic disease which requires long-term use of oral analgesics, NSAIDs, antihistamines and local anaesthetics • Previously diagnosed hypersensitivity to benzydamine, other NSAIDs, cetylpyridinium chloride or any other component of study drugs including the rescue medication (paracetamol) • Subject is currently participating in another clinical trial • Excessive alcohol consumption, drug abuse or drug addiction • Subject refuses to participate with the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: - to demonstrate the equivalence of the treatment effect between test and reference product in terms of the sore throat pain intensity difference at the predefined time point compared to baseline . _WIthin the main objective a superiority of the treatment effect of both test and reference treatment over placebo treatment is to be demonstrated in terms of sore throat pain intensity difference at the predefined time point compared to baseline. ;Secondary Objective: -to assess the safety profile of test in comparison with reference IMP and placebo - to demonstrate similar safety profile in test and reference IMP infections.;Primary end point(s): • Sore throat pain intensity (STPI) difference at 1 hour after the IMP administration (STPID1h). Defined as the mean difference between STPI score at 1 hour after the IMP administration and the baseline STPI score, assessed before the IMP administration at Visit 1. STPI is assessed by visual analogue scale ( VAS);Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 60 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): 1. Percent of responders after the initial single IMP dose (% RESP). Defined as the share of subjects who respond to the therapy with respect to the total number of subjects taking the same IMP 2. Mean sore throat pain intensity STPI) difference at 2 hours after the IMP administration (STPID2h). Defined as the mean difference between STPI score at 2 hours after the IMP administration and the baseline STPI score, assessed before the IMP administration at Visit 1. STPI is assessed by visual analogue scale ( VAS) 3. Mean sore throat pain intensity STPI) difference at 3 hours after the IMP administration (STPID3h). Defined as the mean difference between STPI score at 3 hours after the IMP administration and the baseline STPI score, assessed before the IMP administration at Visit 1. STPI is assessed by visual analogue scale ( VAS) 4. Total pain relief over the time interval of 15 min to 180 minutes after the IMP administration at Visit 1 (TOTPAR). Defined as mean area under the curve (AUC) of sore throat pain relief (STPAR) scores. These scores are assessed by the STPAR scale. 5. Time to Sore Throat Pain relief (TSTPAR). Defined as the time in minutes to at least 1 point increase on the STPAR scale followed by at least 3-point STPAR score on at least two consecutive measurements. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 1. 180 min 2. 120 min 3. 180 min 4. 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120, 135, 150, 165 and 180 min 5. 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120, 135, 150, 165 and 180 min

Countries

Russian Federation, Slovenia

Contacts

Public ContactInfo tocka raziskave

KRKA, tovarna zdravil, d. d., Novo mesto

marko.boh@krka.biz0038614751489

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026