Skip to content

Randomized study with a run-in dose-selection phase to assess the added value of lenalidomide in combination with standard remission-induction chemotherapy and post-remission treatment in patients aged 18-65 years with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high risk myelodysplasia (MDS) (IPSS-R risk score > 4.5)

Randomized study with a run-in dose-selection phase to assess the added value of lenalidomide in combination with standard remission-induction chemotherapy and post-remission treatment in patients aged 18-65 years with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high risk myelodysplasia (MDS) (IPSS-R risk score > 4.5) - HOVON 132 AML/SAKK 30/13

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2013-002843-26-SE
Enrollment
860
Registered
2014-06-27
Start date
2015-02-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) MedDRA version: 17.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10000886 Term: Acute myeloid leukemia System Organ Class: 100000004864 MedDRA version: 17.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10028532 Term: Myelodysplasia System Organ Class: 100000004864

Interventions

Sponsors

HOVON Foundation
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Age 18-65 years, inclusive • Patients with a diagnosis of - AML and related precursor neoplasms according to WHO 2008 classification (excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia) including secondary AML ((after an antecedent hematological disease (e.g. MDS) and therapy-related AML)), or - acute leukemia's of ambiguous lineage according to WHO 2008, or - refractory anemia with excess of blasts (MDS) and IPSS-R score > 4.5 • WHO performance status 0, 1 or 2 • Sampled bone marrow and/ blood cells at diagnosis for centralized molecular analysis, MRD evaluation and biobanking, unless in case of a dry marrow tap with no possibility to collect marrow cells. In cases of marrow tap failure only blood cells will be sampled. • Adequate renal and hepatic functions, unless clearly disease related, as indicated by the following laboratory values: - Serum creatinine =1.0 mg/dL (=88.7 µmol/L); if serum creatinine >1.0 mg/dL (>88.7 µmol/L), then the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) must be >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 as calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation where Predicted GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) = 186 x (Serum Creatinine in mg/dL)-1.154 x (age in years)-0.203 x (0.742 if patient is female) x (1.212 if patient is black) NOTE: if serum creatinine is measured in umol/L, recalculate it in mg/dL according to the equation: 1 mg/dL = 88.7 umol/L) and use above mentioned formula. - Serum bilirubin =2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) - Aspartate transaminase (AST) = 2.5 x ULN - Alanine transaminase (ALT) = 2.5 x ULN - Alkaline phosphatase = 2.5 x ULN • Written informed consent • Ability to adhere to the lenalidomide Pregnancy Prevention Program Part B: • CR or CRi • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) = 1.5 x 109/L • Platelet count = 75 x 109/L • Serum creatinine clearance = 30 ml/min • Total bilirubin = 2.5 x ULN • AST = 2.5 x ULN • ALT = 2.5 x ULN Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 773 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 87

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Previous therapy with lenalidomide • Acute promyelocytic leukemia • Myeloproliferative neoplasia • Previous treatment for AML or high risk MDS (IPSS-R > 4.5), except hydroxyurea • Concurrent history of active malignancy in two past years prior to diagnosis except for: - basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin - in situ carcinoma of the cervix • Concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical condition (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes, infection, hypertension, pulmonary disease etcetera) • Cardiac dysfunction as defined by: - Myocardial infarction within the last 6 months of study entry, or - Reduced left ventricular function with an ejection fraction < 50% as measured by MUG scan or echocardiogram or - Unstable angina, or - Unstable cardiac arrhythmias • Pregnant or lactating females • Unwilling or not capable to use effective means of birth control • Any psychological, familial, sociological and geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule Part B: • Severe cardiac dysfunction (NYHA classification II-IV, see appendix G) • Severe pulmonary dysfunction (CTCAE grade III-IV, see appendix F) • Severe neurological or psychiatric disease • Serious active infections • Previous serious toxicities related to the use of lenalidomide • CMV reactivation, which is not responsive to first line valganciclovir

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Part A run-in: • To select in a randomized approach the feasible dose level of lenalidomide when given orally at three variable dose levels (20 mg/ day 1-21; 30 mg/ day 1-21 and 40 mg/ day 1-21 ) in combination with standard induction cycles I and II in patients with AML or MDS with IPSSR>4.5 Part A: • To evaluate the effect of lenalidomide on EFS at the selected (during Part A run-in) feasible dose level when combined with remission induction chemotherapy cycles I and II in a randomized comparison to remission induction cycles I and II without addition of lenalidomide in a phase III study Part B: • To evaluate the effect of 6 cycles of maintenance therapy with lenalidomide treatment (10 mg/day for 21 days followed by 14 days rest) after post remission chemotherapy cycle III or autoHSCT versus observation only;Secondary Objective: Part A : • To investigate the efficacy of lenalidomide in combination with remission induction chemotherapy cycles I and II (compared to the same treatment without lenalidomide) in all patients with regard to complete remission rate (CR/CRi), DFS, CIR and OS • To investigate the clinical efficacy of lenalidomide in combination with cycles I and II in molecularly and cytogenetically distinguishable subsets with regard to CR/CRi, DFS, CIR and OS • To evaluate the treatment effects according to MRD measurements following therapy by standardized sampling of marrow/blood following remission induction treatment Part B: • To investigate the clinical efficacy of lenalidomide with regard to DFS and OS measured from 2nd randomization • To assess post remission and post transplant adverse events and need for transfusions when lenalidomide is applied after post remission chemotherapy/autoHSCT See protocol for full secondary objectives!;Primary end point(s): Primary endpoint Part A-run-in: Lenalidomide dose level selection • DLT and duration of myelosuppression of induction treatment with or without lenalidomide for each of the dist

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Secondary endpoints Part A Run-in : Lenalidomide dose level selection • Response (CR and CRi) after induction therapy cycles I and II Secondary endpoints Part A: Induction- Efficacy • EFS in the distinct prognostic subsets (AML good-risk vs. AML intermediate-risk vs. AML poor-risk vs. AML-very poor-risk) and cytogenetically and molecularly defined subgroups of AML • Response (CR and CRi) after induction therapy cycles I and II • Disease-free survival (DFS, measured from time of CR/CRi to day of relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurs first) • OS measured from the time of registration • Outcome of induction treatments in relation to MRD measurements • Evaluation of molecular prognostic markers and gene expression profiles for and overexpression of defined genes (e.g. EVI1, cereblon) for outcome in relation to induction and post induction treatment • Toxicities • Evaluation of MRD after induction and post-induction treatments • Time to hematopoietic recovery (ANC 0.5 and 1.0 x 109/L; platelets 50 and 100 x 109/L) after each treatment cycle • Number of platelet transfusions and last day of platelet transfusion after each cycle • Impact of the use of lenalidomide on the effectiveness of stem cell mobilization Secondary endpoints Part B: Maintenance - efficacy • OS and DFS measured from 2nd randomization, and also in the distinct prognostic subsets (AML good-risk vs. AML intermediate-risk vs. AML poor-risk vs. AML very poor-risk) and cytogenetically and molecularly defined subgroups of AML • Toxicities • Number of platelet transfusions and last day of platelet transfusion after each cycle • Number of RBC transfusions in relation to maintenance or no maintenance treatment • Evaluation of MRD after 2nd randomization • Time to hematopoietic recovery (ANC 0.5 and 1.0x109/L; platelets 50 and 100x109/L) after each treatment cycle ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: At the end of the trial. After last patient has completed mainten

Countries

Belgium, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland

Contacts

Public ContactHOVON Data Center

HOVON Data Center

hdc@erasmusmc.nl+31(0)107041560

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026