Skip to content

Clinical trial phase IV, randomized, to evaluate the efficacy of Polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid vs Polyethylene glycol alone in patients with a history of poorly prepared colonoscopy .

Clinical trial phase IV, randomized, to evaluate the efficacy of Polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid vs Polyethylene glycol alone in patients with a history of poorly prepared colonoscopy .

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2013-002506-31-ES
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2013-09-05
Start date
2013-12-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

outpatients with past poor bowel preparation, defined as a score less than 5, according to the Boston scale

Interventions

Trade Name: Moviprep Product Name: Moviprep Pharmaceutical Form: Powder and solvent for oral solution INN or Proposed INN: macrogol Other descriptive name: MACROGOL 3350 Concentration unit: g gram(s)

Sponsors

Dr Antonio Gimeno
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ? Age> 18 years ? Outpatients with a history of past poor bowel prep, defined according to the Boston scale as a score less than 5. (26) ? Signed informed consent Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 438 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: paralytic ileus, intestinal obstruction, megacolon, poorly controlled hypertension (systolic pressure> 180, dyastolic pressure> 100), congestive heart failure, acute liver failure, end stage renal disease (dialysis or pre-dialysis), New York Heart Association class III-IV, pregnancy, diagnosis of phenylketonuria, diagnosis of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, dementia, prior inclusion. The informed consent will be required for all subjects who met the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary Objective: 1) To compare the degree of tolerance between the two preparations. 2) To compare the detection rate of colorectal neoplasia;Primary end point(s): colonic cleansing assessed by a validated cleansing scale (Boston scale).;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: In colonoscopy examination, two days from starting treatment.;Main Objective: To compare a 4l PEG based intensive colonic cleansing with another one based on 2l PEG plus ascorbic acid in patients with past poor colon preparation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): to assess the tolerance by a visual analog scale and the detection of colorectal lesions.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: In colonoscopy examination, two days from starting treatment.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Public ContactUnidad de Ensayos clínicos

UCICEC

a.aldea@gmail.com34922678117

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026