Skip to content

STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF MINOCYCLINE IN ANGELMAN SYNDROME (A-MANECE STUDY)

RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL, PLACEBO COMPARED TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF MINOCYCLINE IN ANGELMAN SYNDROME (A-MANECE STUDY) - A-MANECE

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2013-002154-67-ES
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2013-09-16
Start date
2013-12-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Angelman Syndrome MedDRA version: 16.0 Level: PT Classification code 10049004 Term: Angelman's syndrome System Organ Class: 10010331 - Congenital, familial and genetic disorders

Interventions

Trade Name: Aknemin 50 Pharmaceutical Form: Capsule INN or Proposed INN: MINOCYCLINE CAS Number: 13614-98-7 Current Sponsor code: PL 33016/0005 Other descriptive name: MINOCYCLINE HYDROCHLORIDE Concen

Sponsors

Dra. Cristina Avendaño Solá
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Male or female between 6 and 30 years old. (2) Clinical diagnosis of Angelman Syndrome and molecular confirmation of diagnosis. (3) The participant has an acceptable guardian can give consent on behalf of the participant. Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: 32 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) no F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Patients with hypersensitivity to tetracyclines. (2) Patients with impaired hepatic or renal function and in those with mainly drug allergy history. (3) Any other condition that in the opinion of the investigator is considered clinically relevant and that administration of minocycline contraindicated ..

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To explore the efficacy of Mynocicline in the treatment of patients affected of Angelman Syndrome, in terms of increase in the age of development;Secondary Objective: 1) To compare mynocicline efficay vs placebo in terms of: -specific improvement of cognitive development, language and comunication, motor development, social-emotional development and adaptative conduct. - improvement of adaptive behaviour, , the ability to adapt to changes in their environment, learn new skills everyday and the level of independence 2) To evaluate the safety of mynociclne;Primary end point(s): Increased on the equivalent age of development, obtained through Development Scale R Merrill-Palmer (MP-R);Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 8, 16 and 24 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): - Improved specific cognitive, language and communication, motor development, social-emotional and adaptive behavior obtained through Development Scale R Merrill-Palmer (MP-R), at 8, 16 and 24 weeks. - Improved adaptive behaviors, the ability to adapt to changes in their environment, learn new life skills and level of independence in the 8, 16 and 24 weeks obtained through the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Fourth Edition ( Vin-II). - Improvement of EEG. Measure based on changes in the background activity, type, number and duration of crises, widespread tendency to crises, paroxysmal abnormalities recorded types and the overall evaluation of clinical neurophysiologist, at 8, 16 and 24 weeks - Safety and tolerability. a) Physical Examination b) Vital signs c) Laboratory Tests d) Adverse effects (AEs) list for treatment, laboratory values, values ??outside the reference range and descriptive statistics.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 8, 16 and 24 weeks

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Public ContactDra. Belén Ruiz Antorán

No

mariabelen.ruiz@salud.madrid.org34911917479

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026