Skip to content

Efficacy and safety of Aflibercept (Eylea®) in proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Efficacy and safety of Aflibercept (Eylea®) in proliferative diabetic retinopathy - MEDICARE

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2013-001856-36-FR
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-02-16
Start date
2013-08-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Percentage of patients showing regression of retinal neovascularization between baseline and month 12 in the Aflibercept group versus laser group MedDRA version: 18.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10036857 Term: Proliferative diabetic retinopathy System Organ Class: 100000004853

Interventions

Trade Name: Eylea® 40mg/ml Product Name: aflibercept Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection

Sponsors

CHU DE POITIERS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diabetic patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy - Aged 18 years old or more - Best corrected visual acuity score = 35 letters - Glycosylated hemoglobin rate =65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 10

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Any history of retinal laser photocoagulation - Any history of intravitreal injection - Any history of vitrectomy - proliferative diabetic retinopathy associated to retinal detachment - proliferative diabetic retinopathy associated to fibrovascular proliferation - florid proliferative diabetic retinopathy - Allergy to fluorescein - Active infectious disease - Any significant recent (less than 3 months) cardiovascular disorder (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, renal failure) - Any ocular disorder that could prevent retinal examination (cataract) - Significant macular edema =350 µm.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Percentage of patients showing regression of retinal neovascularization between baseline and month 12 in the Aflibercept group versus laser group;Secondary Objective: Percentage of patients showing regression of retinal neovascularization between baseline and month 3 and 6 in the Aflibercept group versus laser group. - Variation of central macular thickness on SD-OCT between baseline months 3, 6 and 12. - Mean visual acuity variation (ETDRS score) between baseline and month 12. - Percentage of patients requiring vitrectomy for persistent intravitreal hemorrhage (more than 1 month) or retinal detachment at month 12 into the two groups. ;Primary end point(s): Percentage of patients showing regression of retinal neovascularization in the Aflibercept group versus laser group;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Percentage of patients showing regression of retinal neovascularization . - Variation of central macular thickness on SD-OCT - Mean visual acuity variation - Percentage of patients requiring vitrectomy for persistent intravitreal hemorrhage or retinal detachment ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: -3, 6, 12 months

Countries

France

Contacts

Public ContactFANNY ABRIAT

CHU DE POITIERS

fanny.abriat@chu-poitiers.fr0549443796

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026