Skip to content

Multidisciplinary approach versus conventional approach in colonic preparation of hospitalized patients. A randomized controlled trial

Multidisciplinary approach versus conventional approach in colonic preparation of hospitalized patients. A randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2013-000869-36-ES
Enrollment
162
Registered
2013-04-09
Start date
2013-06-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colon preparation for colonoscopy MedDRA version: 14.1 Level: PT Classification code 10010007 Term: Colonoscopy System Organ Class: 10022891 - Investigations

Interventions

Trade Name: solución evacuante Bohm sobres Product Name: Polietilenglicol Pharmaceutical Form: Powder for oral solution in sachet INN or Proposed INN: Macrogol CAS Number: 25322-68-3 Other descriptive

Sponsors

Fundació Parc Taulí
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Hospitalized patients who undergo a non urgent colonoscopy 2. Patients who give informed consent to participate in the study 3. Patients older than 18 years 4. Patients who undergo total colonoscolpy Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 81 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 81

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Non compliance with the 48 hours diet prescribed 2. The endoscopy planned is a rectosigmoidoscopy 3. Previous colonic surgery 4. Mental/cognitive impairment preventing tthe study assessments 5. Severe renal failure 6. Electrolitic disbalance (hyponatremia, hypokaliemia, Hyperfosfatemia, hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia) 7. Intestinal obstruction, perforation or toxic megacolon 8. Pregnant or nursing women 9. Alergy/intolerance to PEG, bisacodyl or adjuvants 10. No informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To compare the efficacy of a multidisciplinary approach (education, low fiber diet, PEG 2L bisacodyl and adjuvant) versus a conventional approach (low fiber diet plus PEG 4 L) in cleaning the colon of hospitalized patients;Secondary Objective: Not applicable;Primary end point(s): percentage of patients with adequate bowel preparation, defined as a preparation which allows exploring the whole colonic mucose and detecting flat lesions (Rating as good or excellent in the Boston Bowel preparation scale);Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: The evaluation of this endpoint will be during the colonoscopy

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Percentage of patients with adequate bowel preparation by bowel segments, tolerance to the colonoscopy, colonoscopy findings, percentage of complete/uncomplete colonoscopies and reprogramming, complications during and after the procedure, doses of sedation needed during the colonoscopy;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: The evaluation of this endpoint will be during and after the colonoscopy

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Public ContactConsultant Physician - Gastroentero

Fundació Parc Taulí

fjunquera@tauli.cat34937458451

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026