Skip to content

The purpose of this study is to find out more about romosozumab in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. This study will see if romosozumab, given in two different forms, increases bone mineral density and whether it causes any side effects. To do this, romosozumab at one concentration and in one type of syringe will be compared to romosozumab at another concentration and in another type of syringe.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Multiple-dose Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Noninferiority of Romosozumab at a 90 mg/mL Concentration Compared With a 70 mg/mL Concentration in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2013-000434-35-PL
Enrollment
272
Registered
2013-11-12
Start date
2013-12-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postmenopausal osteoporosis MedDRA version: 16.1 Level: PT Classification code 10031285 Term: Osteoporosis postmenopausal System Organ Class: 10028395 - Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders

Interventions

Sponsors

Amgen, Inc
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Subject has provided informed consent prior to initiation of any study-specific activities/procedures • Postmenopausal females (postmenopausal status is defined as no vaginal bleeding or spotting for 12 consecutive months prior to screening) • = 55 to = 90 years of age, at the time of enrollment • Ambulatory • BMD T-score = -2.50 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck, as assessed by the central imaging vendor at the time of screening, based on DXA scans • Subjects has at least two evaluable vertebrae in the L1-L4 region, as assessed by the principal investigator or designee • Subject has at least one evaluable hip, as assessed by the principal investigator or designee • Subject has history of fragility (ie, osteoporosis-related) fracture or subject meets at least 2 of the following clinical risk factors for fracture - = 70 years of age, at the time of enrollment - BMD T-score = -3.00 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck, as assessed by the central imaging vendor at the time of screening, based on DXA scans - current smoking - = 3 glasses of alcohol a day - parental history of fragility (ie, osteoporosis-related) fracture - body weight = 125 pounds/56 kilogram Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 10 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 262

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • BMD T-score < -3.50 at the total hip or femoral neck, as assessed by the central imaging vendor at the time of screening, based on DXA scans • History of hip fracture Use of agents affecting bone metabolism • Strontium ranelate or fluoride (for osteoporosis): more than 1 month of cumulative use within 5 years prior to randomization • IV bisphosphonates Zoledronic acid: - any dose received within 3 years prior to randomization - more than 1 dose received within 5 years prior to randomization IV ibandronate or IV pamidronate: - any dose received within 12 months prior to randomization - more than 3 years of cumulative use, unless last dose received = 5 years prior to randomization • Dose received within the past 18 months prior to randomization: denosumab or any cathepsin K inhibitor, such as odanacatib (MK-0822) • Teriparatide or any PTH analogs - any dose received within 3 months prior to randomization - more than 1 month of cumulative use between 3 and 12 months prior to randomization • Oral bisphosphonates - any dose received within 3 months prior to randomization - more than 1 month of cumulative use between 3 and 12 months prior to randomization • Dose received within the past 6 months prior to randomization: systemic oral or transdermal estrogen or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) (up to 1 month of cumulative use is allowed) • Dose received within the past 6 months prior to randomization: hormonal ablation therapy (up to 1 month of cumulative use is allowed) • Dose received within the past 3 months prior to randomization: tibolone, calcitonin, or cinacalcet • Dose received within the past 3 months prior to randomization: systemic glucocorticosteroids (= 5 mg prednisone equivalent per day for more than 14 days) Medical history • History of metabolic or bone disease (except osteoporosis) that may interfere with the interpretation of the results, such as sclerosteosis, Paget’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteopetrosis, ankylosing spondylitis, Cushing’s disease, hyperprolactinemia, and malabsorption syndrome • Subject with reported history of hearing loss associated with cranial nerve VIII compression due to excessive bone growth (eg, as seen in conditions such as Paget’s disease, sclerosteosis and osteopetrosis) • History of solid organ or bone marrow transplant • Vitamin D insufficiency (defined as serum 25 (OH) vitamin D levels < 20 ng/mL as determined by the central laboratory. Vitamin D repletion will be permitted and subjects may be rescreened. • Current, uncontrolled hyper- or hypothyroidism, defined as thyroid-stimulating hormone and thyroxine outside the normal range, per subject report or chart review • Current, uncontrolled hyper- or hypoparathyroidism, defined as PTH outside the normal range, per subject report or chart review • Current hyper- or hypocalcemia, defined as albumin-adjusted serum calcium outside the normal range, as assessed by the central laboratory. Serum calcium levels may be retested once in case of an elevated serum calcium level within 1.1x the upper limit of normal (ULN) as assessed by the central laboratory. • Positive for Hepatitis B • Positive for Hepatitis C, Chronic Hepatitis C and negative viral load while receiving treatment for Hepatitis C • Positive for Human Immunodeficiency Virus, per subject report or chart review • Malignacy within the last 5 years, except non-melanoma skin cancers, cervical or br

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To evaluate the noninferiority of a 6-month treatment with 210 mg romosozumab administered every month (QM) using a 90 mg/mL concentration compared with 210 mg romosozumab QM using a 70 mg/mL concentration on percent changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine as assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis;Secondary Objective: To evaluate the effect of 6-month treatment with 210 mg romosozumab QM using romo 90 mg/mL and romo 70 mg/mL on: - percent changes in DXA BMD at the total hip and femoral neck - percent changes in bone turnover markers (BTM): bone formation marker procollagen type 1 N-telopeptide (P1NP) and bone resorption marker serum type I collagen C-telopeptide (CTX);Primary end point(s): Percent change from baseline in DXA BMD at the lumbar spine ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Month 6

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): - percent change from baseline in DXA BMD at the total hip - percent change from baseline in DXA BMD at the femoral neck - percent change from baseline in BTMs P1NP and CTX;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Month 6

Countries

Czech Republic, Poland, United States

Contacts

Public ContactIHQ-Medical Info - Clinical Trials

Amgen (Europe) GmbH

MedinfoInternational@amgen.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026