Skip to content

Study to compare the effects of Seretide® Evohaler and a generic Seretide variant on respiratory imaging parameters in asthmatic patients.

Double blind, double dummy, randomized, two way cross-over study to compare the effects of Seretide® Evohaler (supplied by Allen & Hanburys, UK) and a generic test HFA pMDI (manufactured by Cipla Ltd, India) on functional respiratory imaging parameters in asthmatic patients.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2012-005789-36-BE
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2013-01-29
Start date
2013-03-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma MedDRA version: 15.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10049106 Term: Asthma chronic System Organ Class: 10038738 - Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders MedDRA version: 15.1 Level: PT Classification code 10003553 Term: Asthma System Organ Class: 10038738 - Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders MedDRA version: 15.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10003565 Term: Asthmatic System Organ Class: 10038738 - Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders MedDRA version: 15.1

Interventions

Trade Name: Seretide Evohaler 25 microgram /250 microgram/dose pressurised inhalation, suspension Pharmaceutical Form: Pressurised inhalation, suspension INN or Proposed INN: Fluticasone propionate

Sponsors

FluidDA nv
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Male or female patient = 18 years old 2. Written informed consent obtained 3. Patient with a documented diagnosis of asthma according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines 4. Patient with a co-operative attitude and ability to be trained to correctly use the Seretide® and Cipla Seretide generic MDI 5. Female patient of childbearing potential who confirm that a contraception method was used at least 14 days before visit 1 and will continue to use a contraception method during the study 6. Patient must be stable and treated in accordance with the GINA guidelines 7. Patient must be a non-smoker or ex-smoker who have stopped smoking at least 1 year prior to the visit 1 and has a smoking history of =65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 8

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnant or lactating female 2. Unstable patient who developed an exacerbation during the last 8 weeks 3. Patient with upper or lower airways infection 4. Patient unable to carry out pulmonary function testing 5. Patient with an uncontrolled disease or any condition that might, in the judgement of the investigator, place the patient at undue risk or potentially compromise the results or interpretation of the study 6. Patient with cancer or any other chronic disease with poor prognosis and /or affecting patient status 7. Patient with allergy, sensitivity or intolerance to study drugs and/or study drug formulation ingredients 8. Patient unlikely to comply with the protocol or unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study 9. Patient who received oral corticosteroids within the last 4 weeks prior to visit 1 10. Patient who received any investigational new drug within the last 4 weeks prior to visit 1 or twice the duration of the biological effect of any drug (whichever is longer). 11. Patient with a history of alcohol or substance abuse that in the opinion of the investigator may be of clinical significance 12. Patient who has undergone major surgery in the last 12 weeks before the visit 1 or has planned to undergo a major surgery before the end of the trial 13. Patient with diagnosis of COPD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of the products under investigation on Functional respiratory imaging parameters and evaluate the particle deposition with Computational fluid dynamics (CFD). ;Secondary Objective: The secondary objectives of this study are to assess the effect of salmeterol and fluticasone combination therapy on lung function (spirometry and body plethysmography), on exercise capacity (6MWT) and on dyspnea (Borg CR10 Scale and VAS dyspnea). Furthermore the safety of the 2 products under investigation will be evaluated through monitoring of adverse events throughout the study. ;Primary end point(s): The parameters that will be obtained with Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and used as primary outcome parameters are: - Total airway volume and total airway resistance - The number of deposited particles per pre-defined airway section;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: May 2013

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Secondary outcome variables that will be obtained with respective tests are listed below: Spirometry/ Lung function : - Forced Expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), - Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), - Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF), - Maximum Expiratory Flow at 25% of FVC (MEF50), - Maximum Expiratory Flow at 50% of FVC (MEF25), - Inspiratory Vital Capacity (IVC), - Tiffeneau Index (FEV1/FVC ratio) Bodyplethysmography - Functional Residual Capacity (FRC), - Total Lung Capacity (TLC), - Airway resistance: Airway Resistance (Raw), Specific airway conductance (SGaw) 6 Minute Walk Test - Exercise capacity: distance walked in 6 minutes (m) Borg CR10 Scale: measure of the present dyspnea Visual Analog Scale: measure of the difference in dyspnea before and after treatment ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: May 2013

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Public ContactJan De Backer

FluidDA nv

jan.debacker@fluidda.com3234508720

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026