Skip to content

This is a multinational study comparing the efficacy and safety of two medicines , solifenacin succinate and mirabegron taken together, or separately, or a mock treatment (placebo) in subjects with symptoms of overactive bladder.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Combinations of Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Compared to Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Monotherapy in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2012-005735-91-GB
Enrollment
4500
Registered
2013-07-23
Start date
2013-11-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overactive Bladder MedDRA version: 16.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10059617 Term: Overactive bladder System Organ Class: 100000004857

Interventions

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Subject is male or female and at least 18 years of age; • Subject is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly and able to measure his/her vital signs at home at stipulated time points, using the device provided by the study personnel, and to adequately record the readings; • Subject has symptoms of “wet” OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence) for at least 3 months; Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 3250 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 1250

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. In the opinion of the investigator the subject has clinically significant bladder outflow obstruction at risk of urinary retention. 2. Subject has significant PVR volume (> 150 mL). 3. Subject has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urgency incontinence where stress is the predominant factor as determined by the investigator. 4. Subject has a neurological cause for detrusor overactivity (e.g. neurogenic bladder, diabetic neuropathy or systemic or central neurological disease such as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease). 5. Subject has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization. 6. Subject has chronic inflammation such as bladder pain syndrome / interstitial cystitis, symptomatic bladder stones or any previous or current radiation cystitis. 7. Subject has received intravesical treatment in the past 12 months with e.g., botulinum toxin, resiniferatoxin, capsaicin. 8. Subject has moderate to severe hepatic impairment 9. Subject has severe renal impairment 10. Subject has a clinically significant abnormal ECG 11. Subject has a concurrent malignancy or history of cancer (except noninvasive skin cancer) within the last 5 years prior to screening. 12. Subject has a QTcF interval > 450 ms for males or > 470 ms for females or is at risk of QT prolongation (e.g., family history of long QT syndrome, hypokalaemia). 13. Subject has severe hypertension, which is defined as a sitting average systolic blood pressure = 180 mmHg and/or average diastolic blood pressure = 110 mmHg.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of 2 dose combinations of solifenacin and mirabegron compared to solifenacin and mirabegron monotherapy. ;Primary end point(s): • Change from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours at EoT • Change from baseline in mean number of micturitions per 24 hours at EoT ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: EoT;Secondary Objective: • To evaluate the efficacy of 2 dose combinations of solifenacin and mirabegron compared to placebo • To evaluate the safety and tolerability of 2 dose combinations of solifenacin and mirabegron compared to solifenacin and mirabegron monotherapy and placebo • To evaluate the Health Related Outcomes Research (HEOR) outcomes of 2 dose combinations of solifenacin and mirabegron compared to solifenacin and mirabegron monotherapy and placebo • To investigate the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic relationship of 2 dose combinations of solifenacin and mirabegron with solifenacin and mirabegron monotherapies

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): • Change from baseline in mean volume voided per micturition at EoT • Change from baseline in Symptom Bother as assessed by OAB-q at EoT • Change from baseline in Subject assessment of Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS) at EoT;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: EoT

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Korea, Republic of, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

Public ContactService Desk - Gobal Clinical Dev't

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

contact@nl.astellas.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026