Skip to content

Study designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the use of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen before transplantation and of cyclophosphamide after transplantation, in patients with poor prognosis lymphoma undergoing bone marrow transplant from a partially identical donor without elimination of lymphocytes T.

MULTI-CENTER, PHASE II STUDY TO ASSESS THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF HAPLOIDENTICAL BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION USING REDUCED INTENSITY CONDITIONING (RIC) REGIMEN AND POST-TRANSPLANT CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, IN PATIENTS WITH POOR PROGNOSIS LYMPHOMAS.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2012-005580-27-IT
Enrollment
47
Registered
2013-02-12
Start date
2013-04-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-11-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with lymphomas (any histology) relapsed after high dose chemotherapy and in complete remission or partial remission after the last CT line MedDRA version: 14.1 Level: PT Classification code 10003908 Term: B-cell small lymphocytic lymphoma System Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) MedDRA version: 14.1 Level: PT Classification code 10003899 Term: B-cell lymphoma System Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspec

Interventions

Product Name: thiotepa Pharmaceutical Form: Powder for concentrate for solution for infusion INN or Proposed INN: THIOTEPA CAS Number: 52-24-4 Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration type: e

Sponsors

ISTITUTO CLINICO HUMANITAS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: PATIENT-RELATED CRITERIA 1. Age 18-70 years old 2. Karnofsky performance score = 80% 3. HLA typing will be performed at high resolution (allele level) for the HLA-A, -B, Cw, DRB1, and DQB1 loci. A minimum match of 5/10 is required. An unrelated donor search is not required for a patient to be eligible for this protocol if the clinical situation dictates an urgent transplant. 4. The donor and recipient must be identical, as determined by high resolution typing, at least one allele of each of the following genetic loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-Cw, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1 5. Patients with lymphomas (any histology) relapsed after high dose chemotherapy and in complete remission or partial remission after the last CT line. a. Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Patients refractory to at least 2 CT lines, and included in tandem auto-allo program. b. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma Refractory to second line salvage chemotherapy (patients in partial remission, stable disease or progressive). These patients have to be in partial remission or complete remission after last CT line, including high dose chemotherapy (auto-allo program). Transformed low grade lymphomas c. Peripheral T cell lymphoma Patients failing to achieve a complete remission after first line CT. d. Low grade lymphomas (follicular and non follicular) Patients refractory to first R-CT line. Patients failing at least 2 lines CT - The duration of last remission should be =65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 15

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Presence of HLA-matched, related donor (HLA-A, -B, -DRB1) 2. Presence of matched unrelated donor (10/10), available on time. 3. Pregnancy or breast-feeding. 4. Evidence of HIV infection or known HIV positive serology. 5. Current uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection 6. Evidence of progression of clinical symptoms or radiologic findings. 7. Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. 8. CNS lymphoma localization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To evaluate the activity, taking into account an excess of toxicity, of the procedure of T-replete BM infused after a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen and post-transplantation Cy, in patients with poor prognosis lymphoproliferative diseases. ;Secondary Objective: To further evaluate the efficacy and safety of the procedure;Primary end point(s): 1-year progression free survival (PFS) ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 1 year from the treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): • Neutrophil and platelet recovery • Incidence of graft failure • Cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD • Incidence of infections • Cumulative incidence of relapse/progression • Treatment related mortality (TRM) • Immunological reconstitution ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: controls with different frequencies in the interval between transplantation and the 1-year follow-up visit, according to clinical practice

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Public ContactHumanitas Cancer Center

ISTITUTO CLINICO HUMANITAS

luca.castagna@cancercenter.humanitas.it+ 39028224 4587

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026