Skip to content

Verification of the effectiveness of intravenous sildenafil compared to other pulmonary vasodilators used in the test vessel reactivity of pulmonary

Verification of the effectiveness of intravenous sildenafil compared to other pulmonary vasodilators used in the test vessel reactivity of pulmonary - Intravenous sildenafil in children

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2012-004583-22-IT
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2012-10-25
Start date
2012-10-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subjects in children with congenital heart disease surgery or not, with echocardiographic signs of pulmonary hypertension followed at the Pediatric Cardiology Centre of the Mediterranean or reported by other centers I and Level II. MedDRA version: 14.1 Level: SOC Classification code 10047065 Term: Vascular disorders System Organ Class: 10047065 - Vascular disorders

Interventions

Trade Name: REVATIO*EV 1FL 20ML 0,8MG/ML Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection CAS Number: 139755-83- Concentration unit: mg/kg milligram(s)/kilogram Concentration type: up to Concentration numb

Sponsors

OSPEDALE PEDIATRICO BAMBINO GESU' DI ROMA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: subjects in children with congenital heart disease surgery or not, with echocardiographic signs of pulmonary hypertension followed at the Pediatric Cardiology Centre of the Mediterranean or reported by other centers I and Level II. Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: 13 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 2 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 0

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: NA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary Objective: reducing the invasiveness of the procedure, with less intubation / sedation, which is necessary for proper administration of nitric oxide, especially in adolescent patients; - Significant reduction of costs; - Assessing the effectiveness of all, useful prognostic sense and proper therapeutic management in the future.;Main Objective: assess the appropriateness, sensitivity and specificity of sildenafil ev in reducing pulmonary hypertension and its possible superiority in terms of results / costs / organizational aspects than nitric oxide during the execution of the test vessel pulmonary artery reactivity.;Primary end point(s): assessment in cardiac patients with pulmonary hypertension tested for pulmonary vessel reactivity in absolute terms and compared the effectiveness of nitric oxide, sildenafil ev in determining improvement of: - Blood pressure in the pulmonary artery; - Pulmonary capillary pressure; - Transpulmonary gradient; - Flow rate (measured by the method of thermodilution or the Fick principle); - Heating lung total arteriolar and venous capillaries.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: NA

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): - Reducing the invasiveness of the procedure, with less intubation / sedation, which is necessary for proper administration of nitric oxide, especially in adolescent patients; - Significant reduction of costs; - Assessing the effectiveness of all, useful prognostic sense and proper therapeutic management in the future.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: na

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Public ContactCardiologia

Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù

paolo.guccione@opbg.net06.6859. 2459

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026