Skip to content

Treatment of degenerative disc disease with allogenic mesenchymal cells—MSV--

Treatment of degenerative disc disease with allogenic mesenchymal cells—MSV--

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2012-004444-30-ES
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2013-02-04
Start date
2013-04-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Treatment of degenerative disc disease

Interventions

Product Name: Mesenquimal stem cells Product Code: MSV Pharmaceutical Form: Suspension for injection INN or Proposed INN: ringer lactate solution CAS Number: 8026-79-7 Other descriptive name: RINGER'S

Sponsors

Citospin
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Lumbar degenerative disc disease of one or two disks with predominant low back pain and / or sciatica persisting after conservative treatment (medical and physiotherapy) over 6 months. 2. Full annulus, capable of holding cell implantation, demonstrated in the MR image (stages 2, 3 and 4 of Adams) (Adams et al., 2000). 3. Decreased disc space height of more than 20% measured radiographically in lateral view. 4. Absence of spinal infection. 5. Hematological and biochemical analysis without significant alterations that contraindicate surgery 6. The patient is able to understand the nature of the study. 7. Written informed consent of the patient. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 24 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range ;Inclusion criteria: 1. Lumbar degenerative disc disease of one or two disks with predominant low back pain and / or sciatica persisting after conservative treatment (medical and physiotherapy) over 6 months. 2. Full annulus, capable of holding cell implantation, demonstrated in the MR image (stages 2, 3 and 4 of Adams) (Adams et al., 2000). 3. Decreased disc space height of more than 20% measured radiographically in lateral view. 4. Absence of spinal infection. 5. Hematological and biochemical analysis without significant alterations that contraindicate surgery 6. The patient is able to understand the nature of the study. 7. Written informed consent of the patient. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 24 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range ;Inclusion criteria: 1. Lumbar degenerative disc disease of one or two disks with predominant low back pain and / or sciatica persisting after conservative treatment (medical and physiotherapy) over 6 months. 2. Full annulus, capable of holding cell implantation, demonstrated in the MR image (stages 2, 3 and 4 of Adams) (Adams et al., 2000). 3. Decreased disc space height of more than 20% measured radiographically in lateral view. 4. Absence of spinal infection. 5. Hematological and biochemical analysis without significant alterations that contraindicate surgery 6. The patient is able to understand the nature of the study. 7. Written informed consent of the patient. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 24 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Age under 18 or over 75 or legally dependent 2. Allergies gentamicin or bovine sera, bovine or equine. 3. Congenital or acquired deformities of the spine significant obstacles to the application. 4. Pathology conditional spinal segmental instability, spinal canal stenosis, isthmus pathology and other disturbances that might compromise the study at the discretion of the investigators 5. Presence of Modic changes III in MRI images (Modic & Ross, 2007) 6. Excess weight with body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 7. Pregnancy or breastfeeding 8. neoplastic disease 9. Immunosupresive situation. 10. Participation in another clinical trial or treatment with another investigational product within 30 days prior to inclusion in the study. 11. Any other condition or circumstance that would compromise participation in the study medically ;Exclusion criteria: 1. Age under 18 or over 75 or legally dependent 2. Allergies gentamicin or bovine sera, bovine or equine. 3. Congenital or acquired deformities of the spine significant obstacles to the application. 4. Pathology conditional spinal segmental instability, spinal canal stenosis, isthmus pathology and other disturbances that might compromise the study at the discretion of the investigators 5. Presence of Modic changes III in MRI images (Modic & Ross, 2007) 6. Excess weight with body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 7. Pregnancy or breastfeeding 8. neoplastic disease 9. Immunosupresive situation. 10. Participation in another clinical trial or treatment with another investigational product within 30 days prior to inclusion in the study. 11. Any other condition or circumstance that would compromise participation in the study medically ;Exclusion criteria: 1. Age under 18 or over 75 or legally dependent 2. Allergies gentamicin or bovine sera, bovine or equine. 3. Congenital or acquired deformities of the spine significant obstacles to the application. 4. Pathology conditional spinal segmental instability, spinal canal stenosis, isthmus pathology and other disturbances that might compromise the study at the discretion of the investigators 5. Presence of Modic changes III in MRI images (Modic & Ross, 2007) 6. Excess weight with body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 7. Pregnancy or breastfeeding 8. neoplastic disease 9. Immunosupresive situation. 10. Participation in another clinical trial or treatment with another investigational product within 30 days prior to inclusion in the study. 11. Any other condition or circumstance that would compromise participation in the study medically

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Feasibility and security of MSV cells local use for degenerative disc disease treatment.;Secondary Objective: - Efficacy of treatment with MSV allogenic cells. - Monitoring the progress of discal dehydration by MRI T2 calibrated. - compare the efficacy of treatments in experimental and control arms.;Primary end point(s): The objective is to evaluate the efficacy by clinical criteria (visual evaluation Lumbar pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Oswestry Disability Index - ODI - index of quality of life - SF-12 -), and imaging (MRI quantitative) at 6 and 12 months of intervention.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 12 months;Main Objective: Feasibility and security of MSV cells local use for degenerative disc disease treatment.;Secondary Objective: - Efficacy of treatment with MSV allogenic cells. - Monitoring the progress of discal dehydration by MRI T2 calibrated. - compare the efficacy of treatments in experimental and control arms.;Primary end point(s): The objective is to evaluate the efficacy by clinical criteria (visual evaluation Lumbar pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Oswestry Disability Index - ODI - index of quality of life - SF-12 -), and imaging (MRI quantitative) at 6 and 12 months of intervention.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 12 months;Main Objective: Feasibility and security of MSV cells local use for degenerative disc disease treatment.;Secondary Objective: - Efficacy of treatment with MSV allogenic cells. - Monitoring the progress of discal dehydration by MRI T2 calibrated. - compare the efficacy of treatments in experimental and control arms.;Primary end point(s): The objective is to evaluate the efficacy by clinical criteria (visual evaluation Lumbar pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Oswestry Disability Index - ODI - index of quality of life - SF-12 -), and imaging (MRI quantitative) at 6 and 12 months of intervention.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): no applicable;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: no applicable;Secondary end point(s): no applicable;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: no applicable;Secondary end point(s): no applicable;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: no applicable

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Public ContactJavier Soriano Ventura;Javier Soriano Ventura;Javier Soriano Ventura ;;

Fundacion Teofilo Hernando;Fundacion Teofilo Hernando;Fundacion Teofilo Hernando

javier.soriano@uam.es;javier.soriano@uam.es;javier.soriano@uam.es34915202425;34915202425;34915202425

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026