Skip to content

A clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of Octenidine lozenges in the treatment of acute sore throat. Octenedine Lozenges will be compared with an active comparator and against placebo in patients at multiple sites, in a double blind ( patient and doctor) randomised manner.

A randomised, multi-centre, parallel group, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of Octenidine lozenges in the treatment of acute sore throat.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2012-002876-15-DE
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2012-08-09
Start date
2012-11-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute pharyngitis

Interventions

Product Name: Octenidine lozenges Pharmaceutical Form: Lozenge INN or Proposed INN: Octenidine hydrochloride CAS Number: 70775-75-6 Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration type: range Conce

Sponsors

Cassella-med GmbH & Co KG
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Age between 12 and 65 years, signed informed consent -Sore throat for a maximum of 36 hours, short-term adjuvant treatment indicated. -Inflammation of the mucosa of the mouth and throat with typical symptoms like pain, reddening and swelling, to be verified by the investigator by means of: - a physical examination - a Tonsillo-Pharyngitis Score >2 -Pain on two 10 cm visual analogue scales (VAS) (pain at rest and pain when swallowing) at day 0 of at least 10 cm (sum of both VAS). At least 4 cm on each of both VAS. - On-site test for streptococcus negative Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: 85 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 615 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Fever>38°C and/or multiple swollen anterior lymph nodes - Fever>38°C and/or multiple swollen anterior lymph nodes - Purulent tonsillitis and/or rash according to the investigator's clinical judgement - Treatment with systemic antibiotics within the last 7 days - Treatment with any antiseptics, analgesics, local anaesthetics, ambroxol, bromhexin or codeine within the last 12 hours - Actual need for treatment with systemic antibiotics - Allergy to Octenidine or ingredients of neo-angin® (Levomenthol, 2,4-Dichlorbenzylalcohol, Amylmethacresol, Peppermint Oil, Glucose or Sucrose) - Present gastrointestinal diseases or gastrointestinal diseases in the anamnesis which may be regarded as pre-disposition for adverse effects of orally administered antiseptics, e.g. gastrointestinal diseases associated with diarrhoeas and/or imbalances of the microbiological colonisation of the gastrointestinal tract - Diabetes, malignomas, severe infections like hepatitis A, B, C, HIV, tuberculosis - Other diagnoses that could interfere with the study diagnosis or therapy - Immunosuppressive therapy within 2 months prior to study start or during study - Addiction to alcohol or drugs - Pregnancy or lactation - Participation in a further clinical trial at the same time or within the last 4 weeks prior to inclusion into the present study. All exclusion criteria referring to clinical aspects are to be verified by the investigator during a physical examination.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The primary objectives are to demonstrate superiority of Octenidine lozenges compared with placebo in terms of rate of responders, and to demonstrate non-inferiority of Octenidine lozenges compared with active comparator (neo angin®) in terms of the rate of responders. Response is defined as a score of 4 or 5 on the Pain Relief Rating Scale (PRRS) (patient assessment) at visit 3 (study day 3 or 4, LOCF) and a total score of 0 or 1 on the Tonsillo-Pharyngitis Score (TPS) (investigator assessment) at visit 3 (study day 3 or 4, LOCF). Both primary objectives are efficacy objectives ;Secondary Objective: Secondary efficacy objective is to compare Octenidine, matching placebo and active comparator in terms of: -Pain Relief Rating Scale (PRRS): rate of patients with pain relief at visits 2 and 3 and at study day 2 -Tonsillo-Pharyngitis Score (TPS): rate of patients with improvement at visit 2 and visit 3 -Tonsillo-Pharyngitis Score (TPS): mean change from baseline at visit 2 and visit 3 - Visual Analogue Scales (VAS): mean change from baseline at visit 2 and visit 3 The other secondary (safety) objective is to compare Octenidine, matching placebo and active comparator in terms of - adverse events - local adverse reactions according to pre-specified list - results of the physical examination;Primary end point(s): The primary endpoint is a combination of pain relief (assessed by the patient) and reduction of inflammation (assessed clinically by the investigator);Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 4 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): -;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 4 days

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactDr Christian Nauert

Cassella-med GmbH & Co KG

christian.nauert@Klosterfrau.de+49 221 1652 0

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026