Skip to content

Keloid (scar) treatment assesment

Surgical and aesthetic outcome, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness of keloid treatment - Keloid

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2012-002675-34-NL
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2012-06-29
Start date
2012-09-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Keloid

Interventions

Trade Name: TRIAMCINOLONACETONIDE 40 mg/ml Product Name: Kenacort A'40' Product Code: RVG05341 Pharmaceutical Form: Suspension for injection

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Keloid patients, 18-75 yr old, full mental competence, sufficient knowledge of Dutch or English language, keloid suitable for primairy closure after excision, minimum keloid size of 1x1cm. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 166 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 10

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Hypertrofic scars. Keloids less than 1 year existent, burn scars, pregnancy, previous radiotherapy which prohibits additional rediotherapy (only for the group of recurrent keloids), hypersensitivity for lidocaine, adrenaline, triamcinolone. Chronic use (>1 month) of systemic corticosteroids, or immunosuppressive medication (e.g. TNF alfa inhibitors). Use of systemic chemotherapy. Severe morbidity with a life expectancy of less than one year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Keloid disease is a tumorous scar that grows outside of wound borders. It appears as a raised, discoloured lesion that gives rise to aesthetic and psychosocial complaints, itching, and pain. Adequate treatment is indicated, but because of variable results and recurrence of the keloid current therapies are suboptimal. The Objective of the study is to find an effective and permanent treatment against keloid, by comparing current treatments on objective and subjective outcome. We will do this by a randomized controlled intervention study consistent of 2 parts, in oreder to remain close to clinical practice; 1) for primary keloids comparing intralesional cryotherapy with excision combined with corticosteroid injections 2) for recurrent keloids comparing intralesional cryotherapy with excision combined with brachytherapy This results in a total of 4 study arms; 2 in both parts of the study. Primary endpoint is Patient Observer Scar Assesment Scale (POSAS) score. ;Secondary Objective: Secondary endpoints are volume reduction, Skindex-29, SF-36, ED-5Q, QST, histology,appearance of adverse reactions, and indication for further treatment.;Primary end point(s): POSAS score;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: before treatment, 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Secondary endpoints are volume reduction, Skindex-29, SF-36, ED-5Q, QST, histology, appearance of adverse reactions and indication for further treatment.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Volume, skindex-29, SF-36, EQ-5D, adverse reactions: Before treatment, 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after treatment QST, indication for further treatment and Histology: before treatment en 26 weeks after treatment.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026