Skip to content

CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING STANDARD CHEMORADIOTHERAPY VERSUS RADIOTHERAPY ALONE WITH DOSE INTENSIFICATION IN THE PREOPERATIVE APPROACH OF RECTAL CANCER

Phase III randomized trial of preoperative radiotherapy with an integrated simultaneous boost IMRT-IGRT) versus chemoradiotherapy for T3-4 rectal cancer - rectumSIB

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2011-005638-20-IT
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2012-03-05
Start date
2011-02-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with operable rectal cancer MedDRA version: 14.1 Level: PT Classification code 10062099 Term: Rectal neoplasm System Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)

Interventions

Trade Name: XELODA*120CPR RIV 500MG Pharmaceutical Form: Tablet INN or Proposed INN: CAPECITABINE CAS Number: 154361-50-9 Current Sponsor code: NA Other descriptive name: NA Concentration unit: mg mil

Sponsors

CENTRO DI RIFERIMENTO ONCOLOGICO DI AVIANO
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Eligibility criteria include histopathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma with an inferior border within 15 cm of the anal verge. The tumor has to have evidence of T3 or T4 disease on MRI or endoluminal ultrasound. Patients with unresectable mestastatic disease, with an ECOG performance status > 3 and patients not deemed fit for radiotherapy, capecitabine or surgery are excluded. Pregnant or lactating patients, women with child bearing potential who lack effective contraception and patients below 18 years old are excluded as well Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: 0 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 45 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 35

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - ECOG Performance status >3 - previous pelvic radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy - patients with inoperable rectal cancer - unresectable distant metastases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary end point(s): we propose a randomized non-inferiority trial that compares preoperative FUbased chemoradiotherapy to radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost. In case of non-inferiority, the latter approach is considered preferential with regard to toxicity and cost. The metabolic response of the tumor, as assessed by 18F-FDG PET or PET-CT, will be used as a surrogate marker of cause specific outcome.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 4-6 weeks after preoperative treatment;Main Objective: we propose a randomized non-inferiority trial that compares preoperative FUbased chemoradiotherapy to radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost. In case of non-inferiority, the latter approach is considered preferential with regard to toxicity and cost. The metabolic response of the tumor, as assessed by 18F-FDG PET or PET-CT, will be used as a surrogate marker of cause specific outcome.;Secondary Objective: Secondary endpoints: ?? histological downgrading, according to the Dworak classification (13) ?? number of R0, R1 and R2 resections ?? acute and late toxicity, according the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) ?? local control ?? progression free survival ?? survival ?? quality of life ?? cost evaluation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Histological tumor regression grade;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 6-8 weeks after preoperative treatment

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Antonino De Paoli

Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano

adepaoli@cro.it+39 0434 659528

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026