Skip to content

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-assessor, phase 4 study in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis to compare active conventional therapy versus three biologic treatments, and two de-escalation strategies in patients who respond to treatment.

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-assessor, phase 4 study in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis to compare active conventional therapy versus three biologic treatments, and two de-escalation strategies in patients who respond to treatment. - NORD-STAR

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2011-004720-35-DK
Enrollment
800
Registered
2014-02-24
Start date
2014-05-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) MedDRA version: 19.1 Level: PT Classification code 10039073 Term: Rheumatoid arthritis System Organ Class: 10028395 - Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders

Interventions

Trade Name: Cimzia Pharmaceutical Form: Injection Trade Name: Orencia Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe Trade Name: RoActemra Pharmaceutical Form: Infusion Pharmaceu

Sponsors

Karolinska Institutet
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Subject is =18 years of age. 2. Subject has a diagnosis of RA as defined by the newly established ACR/EULAR criteria, 2010 (Appendix D). (Patients should also be classified according to the 1987-revised ACR-classification criteria, without this being an inclusion criteria) (Appendix C). 3. 3.2. 5. = 2 swollen joints AND = 2 tender joints. 6. Subject must fulfill one of the following three criteria: RF positive OR ACPA positive OR CRP >10 mg/L. 7. Female subject is either not of childbearing potential (postmenopausal, surgically sterile etc.), or is of childbearing potential and practicing one of the following methods of birth control throughout the study and for 150 days after study completion: • Intrauterine device (IUD) • Contraceptives (oral, parenteral, patch) for three months prior to study drug administration) • A vasectomized partner 8. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the Screening visit. 9. Subject is judged to be in good general health as determined by the principal investigator based upon the results of medical history, laboratory profile, physical examination, chest X-ray (CXR), and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) performed at Screening. 10. Subjects must be able and willing to provide written informed consent and comply with the requirements of this study protocol. 11. Subjects must be able and willing to self-administer s.c. injections or have a qualified person available to administer s.c. injections. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 400 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 400

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subject has been previously treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for rheumatic diseases. 2. Current active inflammatory joint disease other than RA. 3. Subjects has had a dose of prednisone (or equivalent) >7.5 mg/day or has had a dose change within the preceding 4 weeks. 4. Subject has been treated with intra-articular or parenteral administration of corticosteroids in the preceding 4 weeks. Inhaled corticosteroids for stable medical conditions are allowed. 5. Subject has undergone joint surgery within the preceding two months (at joints to be assessed within the study). 6. Subject has chronic arthritis diagnosed before age 17 years. 7. Subject has a history of an allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to constituents of study drugs. 8. Subject has been treated with any investigational drug within one month prior to screening visit. 9. Active infection of any kind (excluding fungal infections of nail beds), or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization within 4 weeks of screening. 10. Subject has a poorly controlled medical condition, such as uncontrolled diabetes, unstable heart disease, congestive heart failure, recent cerebrovascular accidents and any other condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the subject at risk by participation in the study. 11. Subject has a history of clinically significant hematologic (e.g., severe anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia), renal or liver disease (e.g., fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatitis). 12. Subject has history of neurologic symptoms suggestive of central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disease and/or diagnosis of central demyelinating disease. 13. Subject has history of cancer or lymphoproliferative disease. Allowable exceptions: a. Successfully treated cutaneous squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma b. Localized carcinoma in situ of the cervix c. Curatively treated malignancy (treatment terminated) > 5 years prior to screening 14. Subject has a history of listeriosis, histoplasmosis, untreated TB, persistent chronic infections, or recent active infections requiring hospitalization or treatment with intravenous (iv) anti-infectives within 30 days or oral anti-infectives within 14 days prior to the BL visit. 15. Subjects will be evaluated for latent TB infection with a PPD or QuantiFERON test and X-ray. Subjects with evidence for latent TB will not be enrolled but first assessed according to local guidelines. 16. Subject is known to have immune deficiency, history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) or is otherwise severely immunocompromised. 17. Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study or within 150 days after the last dose of study medication. 18. Men who are planning to father a child during the time they are included in the study. 19. Subject has a history of clinically significant drug or alcohol usage in the last year. 20. Subject has a chronic widespread pain syndrome. 21. Subject is considered by the investigator, for any reason, to be an unsuitable candidate for the study. 22. Subject is unwilling to comply with the study protocol. 23. Screening clinical laboratory analyses show any of the following abnormal laboratory results: a. Aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) > 1.75 times upper limit of normal (ULN). b. Positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). c. Positive tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The objective of this study is to assess and compare 1) the proportion of subjects who achieve remission with active conventional therapy (ACT) versus three different biologic therapies; and 2) two alternative de-escalation strategies in patients who respond to first-line therapy.;Secondary Objective: not applicable;Primary end point(s): A. Treatment Part 1: The primary efficacy outcome is the proportion of patients in remission at week 24 from baseline according to CDAI. B. Treatment Part 2: The primary efficacy outcome is the proportion of patients in remission according to CDAI, at the time point 24 weeks after the dose was first reduced. C. The primary efficacy outcome is the progression of total Sharp van der Heijde score after 56 weeks from baseline.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: A. 24 weeks from baseline B. 24 weeks after the dose was first reduced C. 56 weeks from baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Clinical outcomes are relevant at all time points (vistits between 2-12 weeks of duration throughout the study) Radiographic outcomes are relevant at all time points (vistits between 2-12 weeks of duration throughout the study) ;Secondary end point(s): Clinical outcomes 1. CDAI/SDAI/2010 ACR/EULAR remission at all time points 2. ACR20/ACR50/ACR70/ACR-hybrid 3. DAS28 (based on ESR) •values •DAS28-ESR based disease categories •EULAR responses 4. DAS28-CRP •values •DAS28-CRP based disease categories •EULAR responses 5. SDAI, CDAI values 6. Core set variables (66/68 joint count) 7. FACIT fatigue score and VAS fatigue 8. WPAI 9. EQ5D 10. HAQ 11. SF36 12. Patient VAS for general health and pain assessment 13. Physician VAS for general health assessment Radiographic outcomes Change in modified total Sharp score, modified Sharp erosion score, modified Sharp joint space narrowing score, the proportion of patients without radiographic progression (defined as change in total modified Sharp score <= 0) and the reduction of predicted progression according to the published ”POPERA” model

Countries

Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden

Contacts

Public ContactMonica Rydén Aulin

Karolinska Institute

monica.ryden.aulin@ki.se46 8 517 711 10

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 8, 2026