Skip to content

A randomized pilot study comparing the safety of DAbigatran and RIvaroxaban versus NAdroparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after knee arthroplasty surgery. DARINA

A randomized pilot study comparing the safety of DAbigatran and RIvaroxaban versus NAdroparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after knee arthroplasty surgery. DARINA

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2011-003556-39-NL
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2012-05-24
Start date
2012-06-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

After total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery, patients are at risk to develop venous thromboembolism (VTE). Two novel agents, dabigatran and rivaroxaban, recently gained market authorisation for prevention of venous thromboembolism after knee arthroplasty. Our aim is to compare the long term use of dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus nadroparin on safety after total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Interventions

Trade Name: Pradaxa Product Name: dabigatran etexilate Pharmaceutical Form: Capsule INN or Proposed INN: DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE CAS Number: 211915-06-9 Current Sponsor code: pradaxa Other descriptive na

Sponsors

Martini Hospital Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients > 18 years and weighing more than 40 kg who are scheduled for primary elective total knee arthroplasty according to the ‘joint care program’ and want to provided signed informed consent are eligible for the study. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 75 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 75

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients will be excluded if they meet one of the following exclusion criteria. -a known inherited or acquired clinically significant active high risk of bleeding or bleeding disorder; -major surgery, trauma, uncontrolled severe arterial hypertension, or myocardial infarction within the last 3 months; -history of acute intracranial disease or hemorrhagic stroke; -gastrointestinal or urogenital bleeding or ulcer disease within the last 6 months; -cirrhotic patients with moderate hepatic impairment (aspartate or alanine aminotransferase (AST, ALT) levels higher than 2x the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) within the last month); -severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min); -treatment with anticoagulants during study drug treatment; -active malignant disease; -pregnancy or breastfeeding; -and unable to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The primary objective of this study is to compare the clinical safety with long term use of the oral once daily unmonitored thrombin inhibitors dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus subcutaneously administered nadroparin by observing the incidence of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding in patients after knee arthroplasty surgery.;Secondary Objective: The secondary objectives of this study are effectivity of the agents, time till bleeding event, compliance, hospital stay, re-hospitalisation, outpatient clinic visits and interventions following complications. Additionally, coagulation monitoring, knee flexion range of motion, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Society Score (KSS) and relationship between health statuses and surgery parameters will be evaluated.;Primary end point(s): The primary endpoint of this study is the clinical safety with long term use of the oral once daily unmonitored thrombin inhibitors dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus subcutaneously administered nadroparin by observing the incidence of major bleeding and clinically relevant non major bleeding in patients after knee arthroplasty surgery.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: After closure of the clinical trial a blinded committee will score bleeding events independently by defining the observed bleeding by the orthopaedic surgeon and the patient information.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): The secondary endpoints of this study are effectivity of the agents (occurrence of PE or DVT), time till bleeding event, compliance, hospital stay, re-hospitalisation, outpatient clinic visits and interventions following complications. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: After closure of the clinical trial a blinded committee will score bleeding events independently by defining the observed bleeding by the orthopaedic surgeon and the patient information.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactLucia van der Veen

Martini Hospital Groningn

l.vd.veen@mzh.nl00310505246783

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026