dysfunction of coronary microcirculation in arterial hypertension MedDRA version: 14.1 Level: HLT Classification code 10010164 Term: Hypertension complications System Organ Class: 10047065 - Vascular disorders
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: •Age =40 and =75 yr. •Body mass index (BMI) =32 kg/m2; •Diastolic BP (DBP) =65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 18
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: • History of secondary HT; • Anamnestic coronary heart disease; • Renal failure (creatinine >1.69 mg/dl or creatinine clearance 5 mEq/l); • Insulin-dependent diabetes; • Significant valvular disease or left ventricular systolic dysfunction at echocardiography; • Treatment with Aliskiren, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in the month preceding the first selection visit; • Patients with stress-induced regional perfusion defects at PET will be referred for coronary angiography and excluded from the study if they have coronary artery disease; • Pregnancy and breastfeeding; • ACEI angioedema, hereditary and/or idiopathic angioedema; • Severe hepatic dysfunction
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Main Objective: to evaluate the effect of aliskiren compared to enelapril in improving myocardial blood pressure in patients with hypertensive heart disease;Secondary Objective: Significant correlation between: -levels of plasma renin activity (PRA) at baseline and at 6 months maximum MBF -delta pressure and delta of myocardial mass indexed (LVMI) -improvement of the indices of systolic-diastolic function of left ventricle and the delta maximum MBF. -delta LVMI and plasma levels of PRA, aldosterone. -No significant correlation between: -delta of maximum pressure and delta MBF (start-end study). -maximum delta-delta LVMI and MBF.;Primary end point(s): Significant difference (=0.5 ml/min/g) in maximum MBF between the two treatment groups.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 6 months | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary end point(s): -Significant correlation between baseline PRA (or delta PRA M0-M6) and increase of maximun MBF at M6; -No significant correlation between delta (resting or ambulatory) BP levels and delta of maximum MBF; -Significant correlation between delta (resting or ambulatory) BP level and delta of LVMI -No significant correlation between delta LVMI and delta maximum MBF; -Significant correlation between improvement of diastolic or systolic markers of LV dysfunction (LV stiffness, E/A ratio , E/Em ratio or TEI index) and delta maximum MBF. -Significant correlation between delta LVMI and PRA – aldosterone values.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 6 months | — |
Countries
Italy
Contacts
Fondazione San Raffaele del Monte Tabor