Skip to content

Study designed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of Certolizumab pegol in combination with Methotrexate in the treatment of subjects suffering from early, progressive active rheumatoid arthritis.

A multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol in combination with methotrexate for inducing and sustaining clinical response in the treatment of dmard-naïve adults with early active rheumatoid arthritis. - -

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2011-001729-25-DE
Enrollment
800
Registered
2012-01-10
Start date
2012-04-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Early active rheumatoid arthritis MedDRA version: 17.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10003268 Term: Arthritis rheumatoid System Organ Class: 100000004859

Interventions

Trade Name: Cimzia Product Name: Certolizumab pegol Product Code: CDP870 Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection INN or Proposed INN: CERTOLIZUMAB PEGOL CAS Number: 428863-50-7 Current Sponsor cod

Sponsors

UCB Pharma SA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. An IRB/ IEC approved written Informed Consent form is signed and dated by the subject prior to any study procedure. 2. This criterion is only applicable for the sub-study and does not impact the eligibility of the subject for the main study: to allow collection of blood samples for the genomic, genetic and proteomic analysis the subjects must have signed and dated an IRB/ IEC approved written Pharmacogenomics Informed Consent form. 3. Subject is considered reliable and capable of adhering to the protocol (eg, able to understand and complete diaries), visit schedule, or medication intake according to the judgment of the Investigator. 4. Subject is male or female and must be at least 18 years old at the Screening Visit. 5. Female subjects must be either postmenopausal for at least 1 year, surgically incapable of childbearing, or effectively practicing an acceptable method of contraception (either oral/parenteral/implantable hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine device or barrier method and spermicide) at Screening. Abstinence only is not an acceptable method. Subjects must agree to use adequate contraception during the study and for at least 3 months (United States/Canada) or 6 months (Europe, Australia and Latin-America) after the last dose of study treatment. Male subjects must agree to ensure they or their female partner(s) use adequate contraception during the study and for at least 3 months (United States/Canada) or 6 months (Europe, Australia and Latin-America) after the subject receives their last dose of study treatment. 6. Subjects must have a time since diagnosis of adult-onset RA less than 1 year as defined by the 2010 ACR / EULAR classification criteria from Screening Visit. 7. Subjects must be DMARD-naïve at Screening and Baseline (except antimalarials, see Section 6.2.2 of the protocol). 8. Subjects must have a positive RF or positive ACPA result at Screening. 9. Subjects must have active RA disease as defined in the study protocol. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 400 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 400

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Female subjects who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the study or within 6 months following last dose of study drug. 2. The subject has previously participated in this study and has received CZP treatment, or has previously received CZP in or outside of another clinical study. 3. The subject has participated in another study of a medication or a medical device under investigation within the last 3 months or is currently participating in another study of a medication or medical device under investigation. 4. The subject has a known hypersensitivity to any components of CZP or with a history of an adverse reaction to polyethylene glycol (PEG). 5. Subjects must not have a secondary, noninflammatory type of musculoskeletal condition that in the Investigator’s opinion is symptomatic enough to interfere with evaluation of the effect of study drug on the subject’s primary diagnosis of RA. 6. Subjects must not have a diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis nor have a Steinbrocker IV functional capacity. 7. Subjects must not have received any experimental nonbiological therapy in the 3 past months or within 5 half-lives prior to Baseline (whichever is longer). 8. Subjects must not have received any experimental or approved biological agent prior to Baseline. 9. Subjects must not have used indicated medications in table 6.1 of the Protocol. 10. Concurrent malignancy or a history of malignancy. 11. Subjects with a history of a lymphoproliferative disorder including lymphoma or signs and symptoms suggestive of lymphoproliferative disease. 12. Subjects with a history of blood dyscrasias. 13. Subjects with a current or recent history, as determined by the Investigator, of severe, progressive, and/or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, or cerebral disease or other significant immunological/inflammatory disease including systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel disease. 14. Subjects with congestive heart failure as defined by the New York Heart Association 1994 classification criteria. 15. Subjects with a history of, or suspected, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. 16. Subjects with any other condition which in the Investigator’s judgment would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study. 17. Subject with a value >1.5x ULN for any of the following liver function tests (LFTs) at Screening: • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [GOT]); • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (glutamate-pyruvate transaminase [GPT]). 18. Subject has history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within the last 1 year. 19. Subject has any medical or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, can jeopardize or would compromise the subject’s ability to participate in this study. 20. Subjects with history of or current clinically active infection (including infections verified by chest X-ray) with histoplasma, coccidiodes, paracoccidioides, pneumocystis, nontuberculous mycobacteria, blastomyces, or aspergillus. 21. Subjects with a history of chronic or recurrent infections (>3 episodes requiring antibiotics or antivirals during the preceding year), recent serious or life-threatening infection within the 6 months prior to the Baseline Visit (including herpes zoster), hospitalization for any infection in the last 6 months or any current sign or symptom that may indicate an infection. 22. Subje

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: PERIOD 1 To demonstrate that the combination of CZP + MTX is superior to PBO + MTX in achieving sustained remission by Week 52. PERIOD 2 to demonstrate that both CZP + MTX dosing frequencies (the standard maintenance dose CZP 200mg every 2 weeks + MTX and the reduced frequency maintenance dose CZP 200mg every 4 weeks + MTX) are superior to CZP stopped dosing + MTX in maintaining subjects in LDA at Week 104;Secondary Objective: PER. 1 • To demonstr. that in DMARD-naïve subj with adult-onset, early active RA present for less than 1y, the combination CZP+MTX is superior to PBO+MTX in achieving sustained LDA at W 52 • To compare the efficacy of CZP+MTX to PBO+MTX based on: - Radiographic progress. - Clinical response - Pt reported outcomes - Productivity within/outside home. PER. 2 • To demonstr. that for subj achieving sustained remission treated with CZP+MTX during PER.1, both CZP+MTX dosing frequencies (std dose /reduced one + MTX) are superior to CZP stopped dosing +MTX in maint. subj in remission at 104 W. • To evaluate for subj who achieved sust. LDA at W 52 the efficacy of 3 treatm. options: - Radiographic progress. - Clinical response - Proportion of subj (also who flared once) in LDA at W 104 - Time to flare using DAS28(ESR) in PER.2 - Pt reported outcomes - Productivity within/outside home. • To evaluate the continued effect of initial treat. with CZP + MTX vs initial treat. with PBO+MTX up to W 104.;Primary end point(s): PERIOD 1 1) proportion of subjects in sustained remission (defined as DAS28[ESR] <2.6 at Week 40 and Week 52 visits) PERIOD 2 2) proportion of subjects who maintain LDA (DAS28[ESR] =3.2) from Week 52 through Week 104 without flaring;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 1) Week 52 2) Week 52 through Week 104

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): PERIOD 1 1) proportion of subjects in sustained LDA (defined as DAS28[ESR] =3.2 at Week 40 and Week 52 visits). 2) Radiographic variables: • change in the van der Heijde modified total sharp score (mTSS), • proportion of subjects with radiographic nonprogression, defined as change in mTSS = 0.5; • change in joint erosion score; • change in joint narrowing score. 3) Clinical variables: •American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50, ACR70 response rates in relation to Baseline, • Proportion of subjects achieving LDA (DAS28[ESR] =3.2); • proportion of subjects achieving a good or moderate EULAR clinical response (according to the DAS28(ESR)-based EULAR response criteria), • changes from Baseline in individual components of the ACR criteria, including tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP)-Visual Analog Scale(VAS), Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), CRP (ratio to Week 0) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, ratio to Week 0), • changes from Baseline in DAS28(ESR), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), • proportion of subjects in remission as defined by 5 separate criteria: - the new ACR/EULAR 2011 remission criteria (TJC =1, SJC = 1, CRP =10mg/L and PtGADA =10 [on a scale of 0 to 100]); - the new ACR/EULAR 2011 remission criteria simplified for clinical practice (TJC = 1, SJC = 1 and PtGADA =10 [on a scale of 0 to 100]); - DAS28(ESR) <2.6;- CDAI =2.8; - SDAI =3.3. 4) Patient-reported variables: • proportion of subjects reaching normative physical function (HAQ-DI score =0.5), • change from Baseline in Bristol RA Fatigue Multidimensional Questionnaire (BRAF–MDQ) total, • scores of the individual questions of the Work Productivity Survey RA (WPS-RA). PERIOD 2 5) the proportion of subjects who are

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

Public ContactCT Registries & Results Disclosure

UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH

clinicaltrials@ucb.com+492173481515

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026