Skip to content

Uncemented total hip implant and subcutaneous injection of Denosumab for patients with degenerative joint disease of the hip. A randomised double blind placebo controlled study on the effects on bone evaluated with bone densitometry, uptake of Fluoride isotop measure with Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography, and blood samples analyzed for bone turnover.

Uncemented total hip implant and subcutaneous injection of Denosumab for patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. A randomised double blind placebo controlled study on the effects on bone evaluated with DXA, PET/CT, and biochemical markers. - DATA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2011-001481-18-SE
Enrollment
64
Registered
2011-08-19
Start date
2011-10-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with osteoarthritis of the hip treated with an uncemented total hip arthroplasty. This procedure is accompanied with an increased risk for loss of bone adjacent to the implants

Interventions

Trade Name: Prolia Product Name: Prolia Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection in pre-filled pen Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Solution for injection Route of administration of the placebo:

Sponsors

Uppsala University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients must fulfil the following criterias to included 1. Male or female patients patients 35-65 years of age with an unilateral OAH requiring a THA and a healthy contralateral hip, 2. Body weight =65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The presence of any of the following criteria will exclude the patient from participating in the study: 1. on or previously have had bone-specific treatment, eg bisphophonates, raloxiphene, parathyroid hormone, strontium ranelate, during the last five years 2. patients on systemical corticosteroid for more than 3 months should not be considered.. 3. patients with diagnosed malignant disease during the last five years or known to have metastasis from malignant disease should be excluded. 4. Patients with renal insufficiency and a se-creatinine-clearance 31 should not be regarded eligible. 6. Patients with known drug or alcohol abuse or regarded as socially dysfunctional, as judged by the investigator, should not be considered for the study. 7. Pregnant women or women planning for pregnancy or fertile women (premenopausal) without contraceptives should not be accepted for the study. 8. Patients that have been exposed frequently and/or have had large irradiation doses, as jugded by the investigator, must not be included in the study. 9. Enrolled in either another investigational drug study, in another investigational device study, or in another investigational study of an approved drug within 30 days prior to Visit 1 of the current study. 10. Any condition or laboratory findings which in the opinion of the Investigator makes the patient unsuitable for inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The primary objective is to study the effect of Denosumab on Bone Mineral Density, Standardised Uptake Value and bone metabolism in patients with total hip arthroplasty. The primary hypothesis is to demonstrate that Denosumab is superior to placebo.;Secondary Objective: The secondary objectives are to: • evaluate the safety and tolerability of Denosumab in patients with total hip arthroplasty • evaluate quality of life after treatment with Denosumab in patients with total hip arthroplasty ;Primary end point(s): 1. BMD, g/cm2, adjacent to the femur implant, Gruen zone 7, and the sum for all Gruen zones after 12 months;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): 1. Fluoride isotope uptake, measured as Standardized Uptake Values, adjacent to the femoral stem, 3 and 6 months after surgery and longitudinal changes during the period after surgery. 2. The study drug’s effects on SUV measured with PET/CT adjacent to the acetabular cup after 3 and 6 months and longitudinal changes during the period after surgery. 3. The study drugs effect on BMD adjacent to the acetabular cup during the follow up period, ie after 3,6, 12 and 24 months 4. The study drug’s effects on biochemical markers for bone turnover and the relation to PET and BMD findings at the proximal femur and acetabulum during the follow up period, ie after 3,6, 12 and 24 months 5. The study drug’s effects on BMD at the lumbar spine and at the contra lateral hip after surgical treatment with an uncemented THA after 12 months (and 24 and 60 months) 6. The study drug’s effects on biochemical markers for bone turnover and the relation to PET and BMD findings at anatomical sites not exposed to surgery, ie the lumbar spine and the contra lateral hip after 3 and 6 months 7. The natural course of an uncemented THA on SUV measured with PET, ie the placebo group after 3 and 6 months (and 24 months) 8. The natural course of an uncemented THA on biochemical markers, ie the placebo group after 3, 6 and 12 months. 9. The study drug’s effect on SUV at the lumbar spine and at the contra lateral hip after surgical treatment with an uncemented THA after 3 and 6 months 10. Patients Quality of Life, measured by Harris Hip score and EQ-5D questionnaires. 11. To evaluate incidence and severity of adverse events during the study period ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 3,6,12,24 months

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

Public ContactHans Mallmin

Uppsala University

hans.mallmin@akademiska.se46186114478

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026